Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Refactor Spanner to use GAPIC client instead of raw grpc stubs #3001

Closed
garrettjonesgoogle opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Refactor Spanner to use GAPIC client instead of raw grpc stubs #3001

garrettjonesgoogle opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@chingor13
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@garrettjonesgoogle
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@garrettjonesgoogle garrettjonesgoogle added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. labels Mar 6, 2018
@yihanzhen yihanzhen self-assigned this Mar 7, 2018
@garrettjonesgoogle garrettjonesgoogle mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2018
Merged
@danoscarmike danoscarmike removed the priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. label Jun 6, 2018
@danoscarmike
Copy link
Contributor

Downgrading priority until plan is locked for this work.

@danoscarmike danoscarmike mentioned this issue Jun 6, 2018
Closed
@chingor13
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in #3881

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chingor13 chingor13

Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@chingor13 @danoscarmike @garrettjonesgoogle @yihanzhen