Missing GetSignedUrlConfig type documentation

[yohanc3]

Please make sure you have searched for information in the following guides.

• Search the issues already opened: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-node/issues
• Check our Troubleshooting guide: https://googlecloudplatform.github.io/google-cloud-node/#/docs/guides/troubleshooting
• Check our FAQ: https://googlecloudplatform.github.io/google-cloud-node/#/docs/guides/faq
• Check our libraries HOW-TO: https://github.com/googleapis/gax-nodejs/blob/main/client-libraries.md
• Check out our authentication guide: https://github.com/googleapis/google-auth-library-nodejs
• Check out handwritten samples for many of our APIs: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/nodejs-docs-samples

Documentation Request

A few days ago I was working with GCP Storage (I was using typescript), and I was using signed urls to download/upload files, and I wanted to download files under a different name. I looked up if there was a way to do that by using this library only, and found some Stack Overflow threads pointing at passing contentDisposition to the config options in the getSignedUrl, I tried that but it did not work. Some comments said you could also append that header to the signed url, I did not try that.

It wasn't until I looked directly into thegetSignedUrlOptions type that I found responseDisposition, then thanks to the docs for the contentDisposition header I got to download files under a different name.

Is there a specific reason why getSignedUrlOptions isn't documented anywhere? I feel like it's important to at least have a rough description of the different config options you can pass into getSignedUrlOptions, or to have a url that points directly to the library's types the user should be aware of. I'd like to volunteer to write the docs for getSignedUrlOptions as well, unless an official supporter does it.

[sofisl]

Are you referring to https://github.com/googleapis/nodejs-storage? Perhaps that question/library may be better there.