You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 26, 2018. It is now read-only.
If you attempt to build a Python gRPC package for foo/bar/service.proto, it generates the Python package foo.bar.service, even if service.proto declares a different package like
// service.proto
syntax = proto3;
package foo.baz
In this case, GAPIC will attempt to generate an import of service as the Python module foo.baz.service rather than foo.bar.service.
It might be nice if packman could detect this discrepancy and either
Issue a warning to the console, or
Fix the protoc output so that it uses the declared package foo.baz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
cc: @bjwatson @tbetbetbe
If you attempt to build a Python gRPC package for
foo/bar/service.proto
, it generates the Python packagefoo.bar.service
, even ifservice.proto
declares a different package likeIn this case, GAPIC will attempt to generate an import of service as the Python module
foo.baz.service
rather thanfoo.bar.service
.It might be nice if packman could detect this discrepancy and either
foo.baz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: