Interpolation problems in Rubik-Italic[wght].ttf

[behdad]

Hello!

This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Rubik-Italic[wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.

The particular version of the font that was tested was archive:.

To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.

The report follows:

Glyph peh_alefMaksuraar was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [0, 3, 1, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph peh_noonar.fina was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] in '', [0, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph peh_rehar.fina was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph peh_yehHamzaabovear was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in '', [0, 1, 4, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph peh_yehar was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] in '', [0, 1, 2, 5, 3, 4] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph peh_zainar.fina was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph theh_yehHamzaabovear was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in '', [0, 1, 4, 2, 3] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph threedotsdownabovear was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2] in '', [1, 2, 0] in 'wght=900.0'
    Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 10 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: False
Glyph twodotsverticalabovear was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1] in '', [1, 0] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph uniFC13 was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3] in '', [0, 3, 1, 2] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph uniFC14 was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] in '', [0, 1, 2, 5, 3, 4] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph uniFC6D was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4] in '', [1, 0, 2, 3, 4] in 'wght=900.0'
Glyph uniFD1E was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] in '', [2, 0, 1, 3, 4, 5] in 'wght=900.0'

This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please apologize and ignore & close it.

To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.