-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What exactly is MXCF and MAPX? #196
Comments
Not calibration, but a distortion formulas. You have part of it.
The radial distortion (from POLY and PYCF) Same technique for the 2D distortion for HyperView (from MAPY and MYCF) (from MAPX and MXCF) "x3", "x5", "x7", "x9", "x11", "x13", "x1y2 This is not easy. But all the math used is provided. |
Thanks for clarifying my confusion. What about the camera intrinsic? I see the HyperView 35mm Equivalent Focal Length is 12mm. Can I estimate it like: 35mm film is 5600x3620(36mmx24mm). Final out size is 3840x2160 |
I don't know if the market equivalent focal length are real. As the distortion profile is different, particularly for HyperView, I wouldn't trust 12mm has any meaning outside of linear projections (is 12mm HFOV, VFOV or ZFOV equivalent?) The ZFOV metadata is the diagonal FOV, this can be used to determine a 35mm equivalent (when ignoring distortion.) If I shot 16x9 Linear with HS on, ZFOV is 100.53°. Which is about 17mm full frame (at 16x9) equivalent. I used https://www.scantips.com/lights/fieldofview.html |
I am trying to undistort the HyperView image. I found these metadata in gpmf, feels like the calibration data.
MXCF: x1x3x5x7x9x11x13x1y2
MAPX: 1.5805143, -8.1668825, 74.519875, -451.50024, 1551.2922, -2735.5422, 1923.1572, -0.10860265
Can you please explain how to interpret this data? Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: