tasks.bib

@article{antunez2012tp,
  ids = {antunez2012tpa},
  title = {Escalas de depresión, ansiedad y estrés (DASS – 21): Validación de la Versión Abreviada en Estudiantes Universitarios Chilenos},
  author = {Antúnez, Zayra and Vinet, Eugenia V},
  date = {2012},
  journaltitle = {terapia psicolÓgica},
  volume = {30},
  pages = {9},
  doi = {10.4067/S0718-48082012000300005},
  abstract = {The high rate of anxiety disorders, depression and stress detected in Chilean university students requires a standardized instrument of diagnosis, enabling timely intervention for these disturbances. The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Abbreviated Scales of Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DASS-21) for Chilean university students, thus validating the scale. The sample consisted of 484 students of Universidad Austral de Chile selected through random sampling using a cross-sectional correlation design. Construct validity was verified by exploratory factor analysis which yielded a three-factor structure, explaining 49.99\% of total variance. Concurrent and divergent validity was verified by the BAI, BDI-II and SCL-90. Adequate reliability and internal consistency of DASS-21 was found using Cronbach’s Alpha.},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Antúnez_Vinet/Antunez_Vinet_2012_Escalas de depresion, ansiedad y estres (DASS – 21).pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GG3IY525/Antúnez and Vinet - 2012 - Escalas de Depresión, Ansiedad y Estrés (DASS - 21.pdf}
}

@article{badosa,
  ids = {badosb},
  title = {Psychometric Properties of the {{Spanish}} Version of {{Depression}}, {{Anxiety}} and {{Stress Scales}} ({{DASS}})},
  author = {Bados, Arturo and Solanas, Antonio and Andrés, Raquel},
  pages = {6},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Bados et al/Bados et al_Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CPIEA5F5/BDI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/E449CXDS/CRQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/F49EUV2W/CRQ_es-ES3.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FJJHBWWD/LSNS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FMARBEKG/CTT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/I5REQTFS/CRQ_es-ES2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KMRATCR6/bRCOPE_Arg.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QY4ISVVS/PBSr_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SVFHLBZ2/Bados et al. - Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of .pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/UJFXI9PQ/PBSr_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XKP5RPB5/PSPPC.pdf}
}

@article{baron-cohen2004jadd,
  ids = {baron-cohen2004jadda},
  title = {The {{Empathy Quotient}}: {{An Investigation}} of {{Adults}} with {{Asperger Syndrome}} or {{High Functioning Autism}}, and {{Normal Sex Differences}}},
  shorttitle = {The {{Empathy Quotient}}},
  author = {Baron-Cohen, Simon and Wheelwright, Sally},
  date = {2004-04},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders},
  shortjournal = {J Autism Dev Disord},
  volume = {34},
  number = {2},
  pages = {163--175},
  issn = {0162-3257},
  doi = {10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00},
  url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ACVDTLAI/Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright - 2004 - The Empathy Quotient An Investigation of Adults w.pdf}
}

@article{bezalel2020tarie,
  title = {‘{{Moral}} Dumbfounding’: {{Moral Foundations Theory}} for the Classroom},
  shorttitle = {‘{{Moral}} Dumbfounding’},
  author = {Bezalel, Glenn Y.},
  date = {2020-07},
  journaltitle = {Theory and Research in Education},
  shortjournal = {Theory and Research in Education},
  volume = {18},
  number = {2},
  pages = {191--210},
  issn = {1477-8785, 1741-3192},
  doi = {10.1177/1477878520934014},
  url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477878520934014},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {There has been a growing literature among philosophers of education on how to frame questions of moral controversy in the classroom. Through the application of hard moral cases that may be said to leave one ‘morally dumbfounded’, I take up Michael Hand’s influential epistemic criterion and attempt to show why its monistic approach is too limited in its ability to capture the complexity of such moral dilemmas. Rather, I argue that the classroom requires a pluralist moral framework, as exemplified by the Moral Foundations Theory, developed by Jonathan Haidt. Not only does Moral Foundations Theory consider the liberal ethic of autonomy, it also extends consideration to the ethics of community and divinity, which is crucial for meeting the broader aims of moral and religious education, such as developing reason, identity and cultural understanding.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NV8K9EAC/Bezalel - 2020 - ‘Moral dumbfounding’ Moral Foundations Theory for.pdf}
}

@article{boehm2019idd,
  title = {Facets of {{Faith}}: {{Spirituality}}, {{Religiosity}}, and {{Parents}} of {{Individuals With Intellectual Disability}}},
  shorttitle = {Facets of {{Faith}}},
  author = {Boehm, Thomas L. and Carter, Erik W.},
  date = {2019-12-01},
  journaltitle = {Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities},
  volume = {57},
  number = {6},
  pages = {512--526},
  issn = {1934-9491, 1934-9556},
  doi = {10.1352/1934-9556-57.6.512},
  url = {https://meridian.allenpress.com/idd/article/57/6/512/432704/Facets-of-Faith-Spirituality-Religiosity-and},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {Although faith has particular prominence in the contemporary American landscape, its intersection with disability and families has received little attention. We examined the spiritual and religious lives of 530 parents and caregivers of family members who have intellectual disability. For most participants, faith had clear relevance and was reflected in their congregational participation, beliefs, practices, and strength of faith. Yet considerable diversity was apparent in the ways in which each was evidenced, which included a modest number of families for whom this was not a salient aspect of their lives. Most participants identified ways in which their spirituality and religious participation contributed to their well-being. However, access to social supports through a local congregation was more muted. We address implications for professionals who support these families and congregations who welcome them. We also offer recommendations for expanding the opportunities and supports parents and caregivers need to flourish in their faith.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Boehm_Carter/Boehm_Carter_2019_Facets of Faith.pdf}
}

@article{bosc1997en,
  ids = {bosc1997ena},
  title = {Development and Validation of a Social Functioning Scale, the {{Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale}}},
  author = {Bosc, M. and Dubini, A. and Polin, V.},
  date = {1997-04},
  journaltitle = {European Neuropsychopharmacology},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {S57-S70},
  issn = {0924977X},
  doi = {10.1016/S0924-977X(97)00420-3},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924977X97004203},
  urldate = {2020-06-20},
  abstract = {The Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS) is a 21-item newly developed scale for the evaluation of patient social motivation and behaviour in depression. The scale was submitted to a validation procedure based on the data from a general population survey in 4000 individuals and from two controlled studies comparing the new selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (NARI), reboxetine, with placebo and / or fluoxetine in 549 patients with major depression. The scale was shown to be valid, reliable and sensitive to change. The results of the multivariate analyses allowed the identification of three principal factors and five clusters. In view of its simplicity of use, and of its peculiar characteristic of investigating patient perspective on self and environment perception and on social motivation and behaviour, the scale represents a useful additional tool for the evaluation of social functioning in depression and will facilitate the development of new antidepressants with differential effects in this domain in depressed patients. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Bosc et al/Bosc et al_1997_Development and validation of a social functioning scale, the Social Adaptation.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DIYTVQFY/Bosc et al. - 1997 - Development and validation of a social functioning.pdf}
}

@article{bradley1994jobtaep,
  title = {Measuring Emotion: {{The}} Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential},
  shorttitle = {Measuring Emotion},
  author = {Bradley, Margaret M. and Lang, Peter J.},
  date = {1994-03},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry},
  shortjournal = {Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry},
  volume = {25},
  number = {1},
  pages = {49--59},
  issn = {00057916},
  doi = {10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0005791694900639},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is a non-verbal pictorial assessment technique that directly measures the pleasure, arousal, and dominance associated with a person’s affective reaction to a wide variety of stimuli. In this experiment, we compare reports of affective experience obtained using SAM, which requires only three simple judgments, to the Semantic Differential scale devised by Mehrabian and Russell (An approach to environmental psychology, 1974) which requires 18 different ratings. Subjective reports were measured to a series of pictures that varied in both affective valence and intensity. Correlations across the two rating methods were high both for reports of experienced pleasure and felt arousal. Differences obtained in the dominance dimension of the two instruments suggest that SAM may better track the personal response to an affective stimulus. SAM is an inexpensive, easy method for quickly assessing reports of affective response in many contexts.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AN3XFZGX/Bradley and Lang - 1994 - Measuring emotion The self-assessment manikin and.pdf}
}

@article{breinbauerk2009rmc,
  title = {Validación en Chile de la Escala de Sobrecarga del Cuidador de Zarit en sus versiones original y abreviada},
  author = {Breinbauer K, Hayo and Vásquez V, Hugo and Mayanz S, Sebastián and Guerra, Claudia and Millán K, Teresa},
  date = {2009-05},
  journaltitle = {Revista médica de Chile},
  shortjournal = {Rev. méd. Chile},
  volume = {137},
  number = {5},
  issn = {0034-9887},
  doi = {10.4067/S0034-98872009000500009},
  url = {http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872009000500009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KTFG2UT5/Breinbauer K et al. - 2009 - Validación en Chile de la Escala de Sobrecarga del.pdf}
}

@article{buchanan,
  ids = {buchanan2010brm},
  title = {A Short Self-Report Measure of Problems with Executive Function Suitable for Administration via the {{Internet}}},
  author = {Buchanan, Tom and Heffernan, Thomas M and Parrott, Andrew C and Ling, Jonathan and Rodgers, Jacqui and Scholey, Andrew B},
  pages = {6},
  doi = {10.3758/BRM.42.3.709},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Buchanan et al/Buchanan et al_A short self-report measure of problems with executive function suitable for.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/L3CP4FWX/Buchanan et al. - 2010 - A short self-report measure of problems with execu.pdf}
}

@article{butler2016ijw,
  title = {The {{PERMA-Profiler}}: {{A}} Brief Multidimensional Measure of Flourishing},
  shorttitle = {The {{PERMA-Profiler}}},
  author = {Butler, Julie and Kern, Margaret L.},
  date = {2016-10-13},
  journaltitle = {International Journal of Wellbeing},
  shortjournal = {Intnl. J. Wellbeing},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1--48},
  issn = {11798602},
  doi = {10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526},
  url = {http://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/526/579},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {In the book Flourish (2011), Seligman defined wellbeing in terms of five pillars: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment, or PERMA. We developed the PERMA-Profiler as a brief measure of PERMA. We first compiled hundreds of theoretically relevant items. Three studies (N = 7,188) reduced, tested, and refined items, resulting in a final set of 15 questions (three items per PERMA domain). Eight additional filler items were added, which assess overall wellbeing, negative emotion, loneliness, and physical health, resulting in a final 23item measure. A series of eight additional studies (N = 31,966) were conducted to test the psychometrics of the measure. The PERMA-Profiler demonstrates acceptable model fit, internal and cross-time consistency, and evidence for content, convergent, and divergent validity. Scores are reported visually as a profile across domains, reflecting the multidimensional nature of flourishing. The PERMA-Profiler adds to the toolbox of wellbeing measures, allowing individuals to monitor their wellbeing across multiple psychosocial domains.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Y9XDUY36/Butler and Kern - 2016 - The PERMA-Profiler A brief multidimensional measu.pdf}
}

@article{cabello2013ejopa,
  title = {A {{Spanish Adaptation}} of the {{Emotion Regulation Questionnaire}}},
  author = {Cabello, Rosario and Salguero, José M. and Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo and Gross, James J.},
  date = {2013-01-01},
  journaltitle = {European Journal of Psychological Assessment},
  shortjournal = {European Journal of Psychological Assessment},
  volume = {29},
  number = {4},
  pages = {234--240},
  issn = {1015-5759, 2151-2426},
  doi = {10.1027/1015-5759/a000150},
  url = {https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1015-5759/a000150},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; Gross \& John, 2003) is widely used to assess individual differences in reappraisal and suppression. The present study tests the psychometric properties, reliability, and validity of a Spanish adaptation of the ERQ on a broad sample of participants of Spanish nationality aged 18–80 years (38\% males, 62\% females). Results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed the expected two-factor structure. Results also indicated adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. In terms of affective functioning, reappraisal use was positively associated with positive emotion, whereas suppression use was negatively associated with positive emotion. In terms of social functioning, reappraisal use was positively associated with social functioning, whereas suppression use was negatively associated with social functioning. These findings suggest that the Spanish version of the ERQ is a valid instrument for evaluating strategies of emotion regulation in the Spanish-speaking population, and can be used for laboratory and applied studies.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/HW4FNVDI/Cabello et al. - 2013 - A Spanish Adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Que.pdf}
}

@article{carreno-moreno2022ieid,
  title = {Validez de la escala de soledad UCLA en cuidadores de pacientes crónicos en Colombia},
  author = {Carreño-Moreno, Sonia Patricia and Chaparro-Díaz, Lorena and Cáliz Romero, Nelly and Rivera Romero, Nathaly},
  date = {2022-07-13},
  journaltitle = {Investigación en Enfermería: Imagen y Desarrollo},
  shortjournal = {Investg. Enferm. Imagen Desarollo.},
  issn = {2027-128X, 0124-2059},
  doi = {10.11144/Javeriana.ie24.vesu},
  url = {https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/imagenydesarrollo/article/view/34546},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Introduction: loneliness in family caregivers is a frequent experience due to the demands of caring for a chronically ill person. Objective: to determine the face and content validity of the UCLA in family caregivers of people with chronic disease. Method: psychometric study of face and content validation of the UCLA scale. Experts in the eld participated in the content validation and the items were assessed in terms of clarity, redundancy and relevance. e Lawshe index modied by Tristan was the statistic used for analysis. For face validation, family caregivers of people with chronic disease participated in a cognitive interview and the areas of comprehension, retrieval, judgment, adequacy of response options and question content were analyzed.},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/V72FDI2T/Carreño-Moreno et al. - 2022 - Validez de la escala de soledad UCLA en cuidadores.pdf}
}

@article{cohen1983jhsb,
  ids = {cohen1983johasb},
  title = {A {{Global Measure}} of {{Perceived Stress}}},
  author = {Cohen, Sheldon and Kamarck, Tom and Mermelstein, Robin},
  date = {1983},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Health and Social Behavior},
  volume = {24},
  number = {4},
  eprint = {2136404},
  eprinttype = {jstor},
  pages = {385--396},
  doi = {10.2307/2136404},
  url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2136404},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Cohen et al/Cohen et al_1983_A Global Measure of Perceived Stress.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/IRTB5UMU/Cohen et al. - 1983 - A Global Measure of Perceived Stress.pdf}
}

@article{cokely2012jdm,
  ids = {cokely2012jdma},
  title = {Measuring {{Risk Literacy}}: {{The Berlin Numeracy Test}}},
  author = {Cokely, Edward T and Galesic, Mirta and Schulz, Eric and Garcia-Retamero, Rocio and Ghazal, Saima},
  date = {2012},
  journaltitle = {Judgment and Decision Making},
  volume = {7},
  number = {1},
  pages = {23},
  abstract = {We introduce the Berlin Numeracy Test, a new psychometrically sound instrument that quickly assesses statistical numeracy and risk literacy. We present 21 studies (n=5336) showing robust psychometric discriminability across 15 countries (e.g., Germany, Pakistan, Japan, USA) and diverse samples (e.g., medical professionals, general populations, Mechanical Turk web panels). Analyses demonstrate desirable patterns of convergent validity (e.g., numeracy, general cognitive abilities), discriminant validity (e.g., personality, motivation), and criterion validity (e.g., numerical and nonnumerical questions about risk). The Berlin Numeracy Test was found to be the strongest predictor of comprehension of everyday risks (e.g., evaluating claims about products and treatments; interpreting forecasts), doubling the predictive power of other numeracy instruments and accounting for unique variance beyond other cognitive tests (e.g., cognitive reflection, working memory, intelligence). The Berlin Numeracy Test typically takes about three minutes to complete and is available in multiple languages and formats, including a computer adaptive test that automatically scores and reports data to researchers (www.riskliteracy.org). The online forum also provides interactive content for public outreach and education, and offers a recommendation system for test format selection. Discussion centers on construct validity of numeracy for risk literacy, underlying cognitive mechanisms, and applications in adaptive decision support.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Cokely et al/Cokely et al_2012_Measuring Risk Literacy.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/X3XAACHD/Cokely et al. - 2012 - Measuring Risk Literacy The Berlin Numeracy Test.pdf}
}

@article{davis,
  ids = {davisa},
  title = {Measuring {{Individual Differences}} in {{Empathy}}: {{Evidence}} for a {{Multidimensional Approach}}},
  author = {Davis, Mark H},
  pages = {14},
  doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Davis/Davis_Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/A3EY443G/Davis - Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy Evide.pdf}
}

@article{daza2002jpba,
  ids = {daza2002jpbaa},
  title = {The {{Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21}}: {{Spanish Translation}} and {{Validation}} with a {{Hispanic Sample}}},
  author = {Daza, Patricia and Novy, Diane M and Stanley, Melinda A and Averill, Patricia},
  date = {2002},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment},
  pages = {11},
  doi = {10.1023/A:1016014818163},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Daza et al/Daza et al_2002_The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/V3IDDF6I/Daza et al. - 2002 - The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Spanish Tr.pdf}
}

@article{delvalle2022pr,
  title = {Argentinean {{Adaptation}} and {{Psychometric Properties}} of the {{Emotion Regulation Questionnaire}} ({{ERQ}})},
  author = {{delValle}, Macarena V. and Andrés, María Laura and Urquijo, Sebastián and Zamora, Eliana V. and Mehta, Ashish and Gross, James J.},
  date = {2022-10},
  journaltitle = {Psychological Reports},
  shortjournal = {Psychol Rep},
  volume = {125},
  number = {5},
  pages = {2733--2759},
  issn = {0033-2941, 1558-691X},
  doi = {10.1177/00332941211021343},
  url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00332941211021343},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) is a self-report measure designed to assess the two most widely studied strategies of Gross' model: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Even though there are two Spanish adaptations of the ERQ, region-specific linguistic factors and dialects must also be considered when adapting a test for another country in order to ensure equivalent evaluations across cultures. The present work developed an Argentinean adaptation of the ERQ. Additionally, the study evaluated its psychometric properties and associations with theoretically related constructs. Study 1 consist of the translation the ERQ into Argentinean Spanish and the analysis of its internal structure and reliability in a sample of 2957 participants. The results supported a two-factor structure with good data fit, adequate factor loadings, and good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Expected age and gender differences in the use of reappraisal and suppression were also observed. Study 2 analyzed the external validity (concurrent and convergent) of the ERQ adaptation in a sample of 2160 participants. Theory-consistent associations were found with emotion regulation mechanisms, anxiety, depression, and personality traits. In summary, the findings support the validity of a new ERQ adaptation and its use in Argentina.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CPE9AMEJ/delValle et al. - 2022 - Argentinean Adaptation and Psychometric Properties.pdf}
}

@article{diaz-vilelajp,
  title = {{{DIFFERENCES IN PARANORMAL BELIEFS ACROSS FIELDS OF STUDY FROM A SPANISH ADAPTATION OF TOBACYK}}’{{S RPBS}}},
  author = {Díaz-Vilela, Luis and Álvarez-González, Carlos J},
  journaltitle = {The Journal of Parapsychology},
  abstract = {The present research had several objectives: (1) to adapt Tobacyk’s (1988) Revised Paranormal Beliefs Scale (RPBS) into Spanish in order to make cross-cultural comparisons possible, (2) to test the reliability and dimensionality of the instrument and check if the previously found dimensions are replicated with Spanish-speaking participants, and (3) to test the hypothesis of the nonequivalence in paranormal beliefs across fields of study groups. The study included 355 students from six university departments, both scientific and nonscientific. The results showed the questionnaire is highly reliable although not additive within our sample. We found a set of conceptually valid first-order empiric dimensions that replicated the findings of two earlier studies, and two second-order factors in line with results of a third study. In addition, differences among students from different fields of study were found, suggesting that training in scientific method produces differences in paranormal beliefs. Cross-cultural research based on this questionnaire is possible.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5YA6M3C7/EAR_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/8PX2MZX3/EAR_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KXGU9I96/CIT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NHR3IJHA/ERQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NKX9AFNX/ESM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RNANEH5T/CAS_en-BR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SCZEE5IS/ESM_pt-BR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/TIFCESLA/ERQ_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VX34NYVY/ERQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XCWYWJUR/Díaz-Vilela and Álvarez-González - DIFFERENCES IN PARANORMAL BELIEFS ACROSS FIELDS OF.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XMVDF2IA/CRS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZGT5X7I8/RSS_es-ES.pdf}
}

@article{diaza,
  title = {Adaptación española de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff},
  author = {Díaz, Darío and Rodríguez-Carvajal, Raquel and Blanco, Amalio and Moreno-Jiménez, Bernardo and Gallardo, Ismael},
  langid = {spanish},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AK544QLK/Díaz et al. - Adaptación española de las escalas de bienestar ps.pdf}
}

@article{eckblad,
  ids = {eckblada},
  title = {Magical {{Ideation}} as an {{Indicator}} of {{Schizotypy}}},
  author = {Eckblad, Mark and Chapman, Loren J},
  pages = {11},
  doi = {10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.215},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Eckblad_Chapman/Eckblad_Chapman_Magical Ideation as an Indicator of Schizotypy.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/K5HBH8RG/Eckblad and Chapman - Magical Ideation as an Indicator of Schizotypy.pdf}
}

@article{everett2018joesp,
  title = {The Costs of Being Consequentialist: {{Social}} Inference from Instrumental Harm and Impartial Beneficence},
  shorttitle = {The Costs of Being Consequentialist},
  author = {Everett, Jim A.C. and Faber, Nadira S. and Savulescu, Julian and Crockett, Molly J.},
  date = {2018-11},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  shortjournal = {Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  volume = {79},
  pages = {200--216},
  issn = {00221031},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.004},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103117308181},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Previous work has demonstrated that people are more likely to trust “deontological” agents who reject harming one person to save many others than “consequentialist” agents who endorse such instrumental harms, which could explain the higher prevalence of non-consequentialist moral intuitions. Yet consequentialism involves endorsing not just instrumental harm, but also impartial beneficence, treating the well-being of every individual as equally important. In four studies (total N = 2086), we investigated preferences for consequentialist vs. nonconsequentialist social partners endorsing instrumental harm or impartial beneficence and examined how such preferences varied across different types of social relationships. Our results demonstrate robust preferences for non-consequentialist over consequentialist agents in the domain of instrumental harm, and weaker – but still evident – preferences in the domain of impartial beneficence. In the domain of instrumental harm, non-consequentialist agents were consistently viewed as more moral and trustworthy, preferred for a range of social roles, and entrusted with more money in economic exchanges. In the domain of impartial beneficence, preferences for non-consequentialist agents were observed for close interpersonal relationships requiring direct interaction (friend, spouse) but not for more distant roles with little-to-no personal interaction (political leader). Collectively our findings demonstrate that preferences for non-consequentialist agents are sensitive to the different dimensions of consequentialist thinking and the relational context.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AMPPCR3W/Everett et al. - 2018 - The costs of being consequentialist Social infere.pdf}
}

@article{fonseca-pedreroa,
  title = {Psychometric Properties of the {{Perceptual Aberration Scale}} and the {{Magical Ideation Scale}} in {{Spanish}} College Students},
  author = {Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo and Paino, Mercedes and Lemos-Giráldez, Serafín and García-Cueto, Eduardo and Villazón-García, Úrsula and Muñiz, José},
  volume = {9},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7JJS4W3B/Fonseca-Pedrero et al. - Psychometric properties of the Perceptual Aberrati.pdf}
}

@article{galiana2020hqlo,
  title = {Development and Validation of the {{Short Professional Quality}} of {{Life Scale}} Based on Versions {{IV}} and {{V}} of the {{Professional Quality}} of {{Life Scale}}},
  author = {Galiana, Laura and Oliver, Amparo and Arena, Fernanda and De Simone, Gustavo and Tomás, José M. and Vidal-Blanco, Gabriel and Muñoz-Martínez, Inmaculada and Sansó, Noemí},
  date = {2020-12},
  journaltitle = {Health and Quality of Life Outcomes},
  shortjournal = {Health Qual Life Outcomes},
  volume = {18},
  number = {1},
  pages = {364},
  issn = {1477-7525},
  doi = {10.1186/s12955-020-01618-3},
  url = {https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-020-01618-3},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Background:\hspace{0.6em} This research presents a short version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, one of the most frequently used questionnaires in the arena of applied healthcare investigation. It measures burnout (BO), compassion fatigue (CF), and compassion satisfaction (CS). Methods:\hspace{0.6em} A 9-item version of the ProQOL was developed. In Study 1, this short version, which used items from ver‑sion IV of the ProQOL, was administered to 817 palliative care professionals from Spain, Argentina, and Brazil. In Study 2, the same nine items, but this time from version V of the ProQOL, were administered to 296 Spanish palliative care professionals. Results:\hspace{0.6em} Study 1: The Short ProQOL showed an adequate internal structure, and invariance across the countries studied (χ2(106)\,=\,185.620 (p\,{$<$}\,0.001), CFI\,=\,.929, RMSEA\,=\,0.058 [0.044, 0.072], SRMR\,=\,0.081). Argentinians showed higher levels of BO (mean difference\,=\,0.172, p\,=\,0.042, Cohen’s d\,=\,0.168), whereas Brazilians showed higher levels of CF (Mean difference\,=\,0.384, p\,=\,0.002, Cohen’s d\,=\,0.352). Study 2: the Short ProQOL again showed adequate internal structure and reliability (χ2(24)\,=\,134.504 (p\,{$<$}\,0.001); CFI\,=\,0.953; RMSEA\,=\,0.126 [0.106, 0.147]; SRMR\,=\,0.063), and was related to coping with death, self-compassion, and self-care. Conclusions:\hspace{0.6em}The Short ProQOL could help facilitate the application of harmonizing measurements and its use for cross-cultural comparisons and occupational health monitoring was satisfactory.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QXJ272NX/Galiana et al. - 2020 - Development and validation of the Short Profession.pdf}
}

@article{garcia-retameroa,
  ids = {munoz2015rldp,munoz2015rldpa},
  title = {Habilidades numéricas y salud: una revisión crítica},
  author = {Garcia-Retamero, Rocio},
  pages = {13},
  langid = {spanish},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Garcia-Retamero/Garcia-Retamero_Habilidades numericas y salud.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/3MBKCK9K/SCGT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/49TMFLYG/DASS21_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4B54LA9N/RTS_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4I6TCGFB/CAS_en-BR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4T735CW7/SILS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5F3LTFCC/PSPPC.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5I3E9GWV/CRTv_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5VRNAR3N/Muñoz et al. - 2015 - Habilidades numéricas y salud una revisión crític.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5YAPV7SK/EAR_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5ZPLSBQR/SRSav_en.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/6XS26AGF/ProQOL_en-US_Manual.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7DRQ3WKV/BART_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7PRBY79K/IEC_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7XZ5T66L/fauxPasEv_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/9HEIDD5Q/PSETPP_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/9HPACSHX/IRI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/9LN89J53/CS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/A3AZBCXL/CS_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/A3QJQ2ES/CRS.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ADC6HHP2/CIT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AP5V3YZE/SWBQ_en-ZA.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ARCI66UC/ERQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BD5GXRS9/SCSORF_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BDIP7K9W/PERMA_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BM4JPNJ9/BNT_esp.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BN3XDUBK/GHQ12_es-CU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BSWFHIJ4/Muñoz et al. - 2015 - Habilidades numéricas y salud una revisión crític.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/C8CS2NKQ/PWb_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CCS2P2J9/DASS21_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CSX96LY4/GHQ12_en-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DE66HGE2/IRS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DKATIPU2/SWBQ_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DZV5U7QJ/PBSr_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EI7V3RFY/MDDF_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ESN4LMBF/bRCOPE_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FAJCEBC8/ESV_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FDRAHB5V/AIM_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FFWZKEFM/REI40_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FRPKEE6Y/CRS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FUCHINL7/UCLA_zh-TW.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FWKR78NQ/CTT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FZW4LM2B/CRQ_es-ES3.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GADT9YVD/REI40_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GZKBB8PT/MIS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/H8U9HLUZ/PWb_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/HDXXJ9D5/HRPVBpost.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/HY2J7QKP/sProQOL_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/HYPGZ9MS/bRCOPE_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ICSRKUQW/PBS_original.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/IS75EWKL/DASS21_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/J2MPMKW3/CRTMCQ4_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/J8ARGIL5/bRCOPE.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/JGH86KBT/DASS21_es-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/JJ8EUXEE/PSS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KA5YNSB9/GHQ12_es-CO.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KWJQ87NF/ESV_Sam_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/L36WPYS6/SRSav_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/L7ETRZSJ/OBJNUM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/LEZZ8B5U/SRA_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/LZSQY9D5/PRFBM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/M9JV4T8M/SBS_en-NZ.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NH8SVJYA/sProQOL_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NLWXER4S/REI40_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NRA6ATQV/ESZ_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NZU9KZHH/IBT_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PBMX7PYP/COVIDCONTROL_en-EU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PDFC4JRC/ESM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PJQ5RCTF/STAI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PQ5CNWL9/BNT_en-GE.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PREW2QBU/MIS_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Q47HGKHS/EmpaTom_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Q8USQ4YS/HRPVB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QE3UPGSD/MDMQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QP4WZX7D/ERQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QPWBD7EC/EQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QX292B6V/IRI_en-US_1.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RAPL2GFB/RSS_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RQT2LACJ/CRQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RT634SS6/sProQOL_es-ES2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RYBLA2XD/LSNS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SF5EG4WC/BNT_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SK7UW6AJ/ERQ_en-IT-GR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SVIZP9U2/EAR_es-CL2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/T9LTLPR5/ESM_pt-BR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/UFMKKGC3/PBSr_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/V7UIMMRX/bRCOPE_Arg.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VAKZVXSJ/EAR_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VSFASCPB/CRQ_es-ES2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VY2HTPXW/ERQ_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/WANPL93B/WEBEXEC_en-GB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/WJNGENF7/BDI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/X26Z9DKC/CRT7_en-CA.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XTHCCSHL/UCLA_es-CO.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Y37CWLZB/EQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/YGMKA8YI/MDMQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/YGRTRZGC/UCLA_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZMVVLN93/IRI_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZNIGCIY4/SASS_en-GB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZUJUEYVU/ICvsID_en-UK.pdf}
}

@article{garcia2019h,
  ids = {garcia2019ha},
  title = {Self Esteem Levels vs Global Scores on the {{Rosenberg}} Self-Esteem Scale},
  author = {García, Jorge Acosta and family=Olmos, given=Francisco Checa, prefix=y, useprefix=true and Matheu, Manuel Lucas and Carreño, Tesifón Parrón},
  date = {2019-03},
  journaltitle = {Heliyon},
  shortjournal = {Heliyon},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {e01378},
  issn = {24058440},
  doi = {10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01378},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844018353763},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {Background: The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSS) is the most widely used instrument to measure this trait. Although the test offers results by levels (low, medium \& high), the mean of global scores it is the indicator mostly used in scientific studies. The purpose of this study is to compare self-esteem levels with the global scores as criteria for contrasting self-esteem in subjects with and without a History of Childhood Sexual Abuse (HCSA). Method: RSS was administered to 74 subjects between 17 and 60 years, half of them with a HCSA, 20 men and 54 women; subjects without a HCSA were used as a comparison group. Results: Using the mean of the global scores as a criterion to compare the two groups, no significant differences were observed. However, when using selfesteem levels as a criterion, the findings indicate significant differences between subjects with and without HCSA. Conclusions: The study shows that self-esteem levels are more accurate than global scores to describe this trait and to make comparisons between groups of subjects.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/García et al/Garcia et al_2019_Self esteem levels vs global scores on the Rosenberg self-esteem scale.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SCAE56FE/García et al. - 2019 - Self esteem levels vs global scores on the Rosenbe.pdf}
}

@article{gomez2003paid,
  title = {Domains of Spiritual Well-Being and Development and Validation of the {{Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire}}},
  author = {Gomez, Rapson and Fisher, John W},
  date = {2003-12},
  journaltitle = {Personality and Individual Differences},
  shortjournal = {Personality and Individual Differences},
  volume = {35},
  number = {8},
  pages = {1975--1991},
  issn = {01918869},
  doi = {10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00045-X},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S019188690300045X},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Fisher (1998) proposed a spiritual well-being model, comprising the domains of personal, communal, environmental and transcendental well-being, and a single global spiritual well-being dimension. This paper reports on four studies aimed at testing Fisher’s theoretical model, and establishing the validity and reliability of a new self-rating questionnaire (Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire; SWBQ), developed to reflect this model. All four studies supported Fisher’s model. The SWBQ showed good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability and variance extracted), and validity (construct, concurrent, discriminant, predictive and factorial independence from personality). The SWBQ has the advantage over other existing spiritual well-being measures in that it is based on a broader and more empirically based conceptualization of spiritual well-being, and has well established psychometric properties.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZRFC2VFJ/Gomez and Fisher - 2003 - Domains of spiritual well-being and development an.pdf}
}

@article{gross,
  ids = {gross2003jopasp},
  title = {Individual {{Differences}} in {{Two Emotion Regulation Processes}}: {{Implications}} for {{Affect}}, {{Relationships}}, and {{Well-Being}}},
  author = {Gross, James J and John, Oliver P},
  pages = {15},
  doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Gross_John/Gross_John_Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GUWDUC44/Gross and John - 2003 - Individual differences in two emotion regulation p.pdf}
}

@article{hays1987jopa,
  title = {A {{Short-Form Measure}} of {{Loneliness}}},
  author = {Hays, Ron and DiMatteo, M. Robin},
  date = {1987-03-01},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Personality Assessment},
  shortjournal = {J. of Personality Assessment},
  volume = {51},
  number = {1},
  pages = {69--81},
  issn = {0022-3891},
  doi = {10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6},
  url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/J7DJHTLS/Hays and DiMatteo - 1987 - A Short-Form Measure of Loneliness.pdf}
}

@article{hetts2000pm,
  title = {The Influence of Anticipated Counterfactual Regret on Behavior},
  author = {Hetts, John J. and Boninger, David S. and Armor, David A. and Gleicher, Faith and Nathanson, Ariel},
  date = {2000-04},
  journaltitle = {Psychology and Marketing},
  shortjournal = {Psychol. Mark.},
  volume = {17},
  number = {4},
  pages = {345--368},
  issn = {0742-6046, 1520-6793},
  doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200004)17:4<345::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-M},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200004)17:4<345::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-M},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VMK5KNJV/Hetts et al. - 2000 - The influence of anticipated counterfactual regret.pdf}
}

@article{hildebrandt2021n,
  title = {Brain Activation during Social Cognition Predicts Everyday Perspective-Taking: {{A}} Combined {{fMRI}} and Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of the Social Brain},
  shorttitle = {Brain Activation during Social Cognition Predicts Everyday Perspective-Taking},
  author = {Hildebrandt, Malin K. and Jauk, Emanuel and Lehmann, Konrad and Maliske, Lara and Kanske, Philipp},
  date = {2021-02},
  journaltitle = {NeuroImage},
  shortjournal = {NeuroImage},
  volume = {227},
  pages = {117624},
  issn = {10538119},
  doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117624},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811920311095},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Identifying distinct neural networks underlying social affect (empathy, compassion) and social cognition (Theory of Mind) has advanced our understanding of social interactions. However, little is known about the relation of activation in these networks to psychological experience in daily life. This study (N = 122) examined the ecological validity of neural activation patterns induced by a laboratory paradigm of social affect and cognition with respect to social interactions in everyday life. We used the EmpaToM task, a naturalistic video-based paradigm for the assessment of empathy, compassion, and Theory of Mind, and combined it with a subsequent 14-day ecological momentary assessment protocol on social interactions. Everyday social affect was predicted by social affect experienced during the EmpaToM task, but not by related neural activation in regions of interest from the social affect network. In contrast, everyday social cognition was predicted by neural activation differences in the medial prefrontal cortex – a region of interest from the social cognition network – but not by social cognition performance in the EmpaToM task. The relationship between medial prefrontal cortex activation and everyday social cognition was stronger for spontaneous rather than deliberate perspective taking during the EmpaToM task, pointing to a distinction between propensity and capacity in social cognition. Finally, this neural indicator of Theory of Mind explained variance in everyday social cognition to a similar extent as an established self-report scale. Taken together, this study provides evidence for the ecological validity of lab-based social affect and cognition paradigms when considering relevant moderating factors.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QNTJBJKG/Hildebrandt et al. - 2021 - Brain activation during social cognition predicts .pdf}
}

@article{hooker2000p,
  ids = {hooker2000pa},
  title = {Impoverished {{Counterfactual Thinking}} Is {{Associated}} with {{Schizophrenia}}},
  author = {Hooker, Christine and Roese, Neal J. and Park, Sohee},
  date = {2000-11},
  journaltitle = {Psychiatry},
  shortjournal = {Psychiatry},
  volume = {63},
  number = {4},
  pages = {326--335},
  issn = {0033-2747, 1943-281X},
  doi = {10.1080/00332747.2000.11024925},
  url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00332747.2000.11024925},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/8BCJTBQC/Hooker et al. - 2000 - Impoverished Counterfactual Thinking is Associated.pdf}
}

@article{houran2003cac,
  ids = {houran2003caca},
  title = {Methodological Note: {{Erratum}} and Comment on the Use of the {{Revised Transliminality Scale}}},
  shorttitle = {Methodological Note},
  author = {Houran, James and Thalbourne, Michael A and Lange, Rense},
  date = {2003-03},
  journaltitle = {Consciousness and Cognition},
  shortjournal = {Consciousness and Cognition},
  volume = {12},
  number = {1},
  pages = {140--144},
  issn = {10538100},
  doi = {10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00025-9},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810002000259},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Houran et al/Houran et al_2003_Methodological note.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RFZ6CIBA/Houran et al. - 2003 - Methodological note Erratum and comment on the us.pdf}
}

@article{huber2012,
  ids = {huber2012r,huber2012ra},
  title = {The {{Centrality}} of {{Religiosity Scale}} ({{CRS}})},
  author = {Huber, Stefan and Huber, Odilo W},
  date = {2012},
  pages = {15},
  doi = {10.3390/rel3030710},
  abstract = {The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) is a measure of the centrality, importance or salience of religious meanings in personality that has been applied yet in more than 100 studies in sociology of religion, psychology of religion and religious studies in 25 countries with in total more than 100,000 participants. It measures the general intensities of five theoretical defined core dimensions of religiosity. The dimensions of public practice, private practice, religious experience, ideology and the intellectual dimensions can together be considered as representative for the total of religious live. From a psychological perspective, the five core-dimensions can be seen as channels or modes in which personal religious constructs are shaped and activated. The activation of religious constructs in personality can be regarded as a valid measure of the degree of religiosity of an individual. The CRS thus derives from the five dimensional measures a combined measure of the centrality of religiosity which is suitable also for interreligious studies. The paper presents the theoretical basis and rationale of its construction with different versions of the CRS in 20 languages with norm values for 21 countries. Furthermore, the paper presents versions of different extension and describes specific modifications that were developed for studies with Buddhists, Hindus and Muslims.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Huber_Huber/Huber_Huber_2012_The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS).pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EYZ3L9GT/Huber and Huber - 2012 - The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS).pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/U7Q2SVEZ/Huber and Huber - 2012 - The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS).pdf}
}

@article{jong2013ejp,
  ids = {jong2013ejpa},
  title = {Fear of {{Death}} and {{Supernatural Beliefs}}: {{Developing A New Supernatural Belief Scale}} to {{Test}} the {{Relationship}}},
  shorttitle = {Fear of {{Death}} and {{Supernatural Beliefs}}},
  author = {Jong, Jonathan and Bluemke, Matthias and Halberstadt, Jamin},
  date = {2013-09},
  journaltitle = {European Journal of Personality},
  shortjournal = {Eur J Pers},
  volume = {27},
  number = {5},
  pages = {495--506},
  issn = {0890-2070, 1099-0984},
  doi = {10.1002/per.1898},
  url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1002/per.1898},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {Fear of death features in both historical and contemporary theories of religion, but the relationship between death anxiety and religious belief is still ambiguous, largely due to the use of inappropriate or imprecise measures. The current studies therefore aimed to develop a valid, targeted measure of respondents’ tendency towards religious belief, the ‘Supernatural Belief Scale’ (SBS), and to use the SBS to examine the relation between death anxiety and religious belief. Results indicate that the SBS shows high reliability and convergent validity and that its relation to death anxiety depends on participants’ religious identification: ‘religious’ participants fear death less the stronger their religious beliefs, whereas ‘non-religious’ participants are more inclined towards religious belief the more they fear death. These studies contribute a new measurement tool for research on religious belief and provide a starting point for an experimental integration of discrepant research findings. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Jong et al/Jong et al_2013_Fear of Death and Supernatural Beliefs.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5NCK2W25/Jong et al. - 2013 - Fear of Death and Supernatural Beliefs Developing.pdf}
}

@article{kanske2015n,
  title = {Dissecting the Social Brain: {{Introducing}} the {{EmpaToM}} to Reveal Distinct Neural Networks and Brain–Behavior Relations for Empathy and {{Theory}} of {{Mind}}},
  shorttitle = {Dissecting the Social Brain},
  author = {Kanske, Philipp and Böckler, Anne and Trautwein, Fynn-Mathis and Singer, Tania},
  date = {2015-11},
  journaltitle = {NeuroImage},
  shortjournal = {NeuroImage},
  volume = {122},
  pages = {6--19},
  issn = {10538119},
  doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.082},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811915007028},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/T5KWD8X9/Kanske et al. - 2015 - Dissecting the social brain Introducing the EmpaT.pdf}
}

@article{keaton,
  title = {Profile 53 {{Rational}}‐{{Experiential Inventory}}–40 ({{REI}}‐40)},
  author = {Keaton, Shaughan A},
  pages = {8},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Keaton/Keaton_Profile 53 Rational‐Experiential Inventory–40 (REI‐40).pdf}
}

@incollection{keaton2017tsolr,
  title = {Rational‐{{Experiential Inventory}}‐40 ({{REI}}‐40): ({{Pacini}} \& {{Epstein}}, 1999)},
  shorttitle = {Rational‐{{Experiential Inventory}}‐40 ({{REI}}‐40)},
  booktitle = {The {{Sourcebook}} of {{Listening Research}}},
  author = {Keaton, Shaughan A.},
  editor = {Worthington, Debra L. and Bodie, Graham D.},
  date = {2017-09-19},
  edition = {1},
  pages = {530--536},
  publisher = {{Wiley}},
  doi = {10.1002/9781119102991.ch59},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119102991.ch59},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  isbn = {978-1-119-10307-3 978-1-119-10299-1},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RWYC3H4R/Keaton - 2017 - Rational‐Experiential Inventory‐40 (REI‐40) (Paci.pdf}
}

@article{koenig1988jags,
  ids = {koenig1988jagsa},
  title = {Religious {{Activities}} and {{Attitudes}} of {{Older Adults}} in a {{Geriatric Assessment Clinic}}},
  author = {Koenig, Harold G. and Moberg, David O. and Kvale, James N.},
  date = {1988-04},
  journaltitle = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  volume = {36},
  number = {4},
  pages = {362--374},
  issn = {00028614},
  doi = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb02365.x},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb02365.x},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Koenig et al/Koenig et al_1988_Religious Activities and Attitudes of Older Adults in a Geriatric Assessment.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/QA6WD9ZE/Koenig et al. - 1988 - Religious Activities and Attitudes of Older Adults.pdf}
}

@incollection{koenig2015mopaspc,
  title = {Measures of {{Religiosity}}},
  booktitle = {Measures of {{Personality}} and {{Social Psychological Constructs}}},
  author = {Koenig, Harold G. and Al Zaben, Faten and Khalifa, Doaa Ahmed and Al Shohaib, Saad},
  date = {2015},
  pages = {530--561},
  publisher = {{Elsevier}},
  doi = {10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00019-X},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B978012386915900019X},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  isbn = {978-0-12-386915-9},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DC6TB26M/Koenig et al. - 2015 - Measures of Religiosity.pdf}
}

@article{lejuez2002joepa,
  title = {Evaluation of a Behavioral Measure of Risk Taking: {{The Balloon Analogue Risk Task}} ({{BART}}).},
  shorttitle = {Evaluation of a Behavioral Measure of Risk Taking},
  author = {Lejuez, C. W. and Read, Jennifer P. and Kahler, Christopher W. and Richards, Jerry B. and Ramsey, Susan E. and Stuart, Gregory L. and Strong, David R. and Brown, Richard A.},
  date = {2002},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied},
  shortjournal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied},
  volume = {8},
  number = {2},
  pages = {75--84},
  issn = {1939-2192, 1076-898X},
  doi = {10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75},
  url = {http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KZHAYASA/Lejuez et al. - 2002 - Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking.pdf}
}

@article{leon2014po,
  title = {Estimating {{Cognitive Reserve}} in {{Healthy Adults Using}} the {{Cognitive Reserve Scale}}},
  author = {León, Irene and García-García, Juan and Roldán-Tapia, Lola},
  editor = {Brucki, Sonia},
  date = {2014-07-22},
  journaltitle = {PLoS ONE},
  shortjournal = {PLoS ONE},
  volume = {9},
  number = {7},
  pages = {e102632},
  issn = {1932-6203},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0102632},
  url = {https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102632},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The concept of cognitive reserve emerged from observed disparities between brain pathology and clinical symptoms. It may explain better neuropsychological performance in healthy individuals. The objectives of this study were to measure reserve in healthy subjects using a new Cognitive Reserve Scale (CRS), analyze the internal consistency of the CRS, and analyze validity evidence. A total of 117 healthy individuals were divided into two groups: 87 adults (aged 18–64 years) and 30 elderly adults (\$65 years). All subjects completed the CRS and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. The internal consistency of the scale was satisfactory (a = 0.77). No significant differences were observed between genders (t = 0.51, p = 0.611), and age was corrected by averaging the CRS score. The study of validity evidence showed that education affected the CRS (t = 22.98, p = 0.004, partial h2 = 0.07) and there was no significant relationship between the CRS and IQ (r = 0.09, p = 0.33). Occupational attainment and the CRS were not related (F2,116 = 0.11, p = 0.898). In line with previous studies on reserve, heterogeneity was observed in the analyses of relationships between the CRS and cognitive performance. There were significant relationships between CRS score and the Verbal Learning Spanish–Complutense Test last trial (r = 0.24, p = 0.009), sum (r = 0.32, p = 0.000), short-term (r = 0.29, p = 0.002) and long-term memory (r = 0.22, p = 0.018), Matrix Reasoning subtest (r = 0.20, p = 0.027) and Block Design subtest (r = 0.20, p = 0.029). No other neuropsychological variables correlated with the CRS (p.0.05). The CRS is a reliable instrument that reflects the frequency of participation in brain-stimulating activities across the lifetime. The associations between the CRS and education and neuropsychological performance support validity evidence.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Q7AZZAEZ/León et al. - 2014 - Estimating Cognitive Reserve in Healthy Adults Usi.pdf}
}

@article{leon2015ap,
  title = {Escala de {{Reserva Cognitiva}} y Envejecimiento},
  author = {León, Irene and García-García, Juan and Roldán-Tapia, Lola},
  date = {2015-12-25},
  journaltitle = {Anales de Psicología},
  shortjournal = {AN PSICOL-SPAIN},
  volume = {32},
  number = {1},
  pages = {218},
  issn = {1695-2294, 0212-9728},
  doi = {10.6018/analesps.32.1.182331},
  url = {http://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/analesps.32.1.182331},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The construct of cognitive reserve attempts to explain why some individuals with brain impairment, and some people during normal ageing, can solve cognitive tasks better than expected. This study aimed to estimate cognitive reserve in a healthy sample of people aged 65 years and over, with special attention to its influence on cognitive performance. For this purpose, it used the Cognitive Reserve Scale (CRS) and a neuropsychological battery that included tests of attention and memory. The results revealed that women obtained higher total CRS raw scores than men. Moreover, the CRS predicted the learning curve, short-term and long-term memory, but not attentional and working memory performance. Thus, the CRS offers a new proxy of cognitive reserve based on cognitively stimulating activities performed by healthy elderly people. Following an active lifestyle throughout life was associated with better intellectual performance and positive effects on relevant aspects of quality of life.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/B5I695QA/León et al. - 2015 - Escala de Reserva Cognitiva y envejecimiento.pdf}
}

@article{leonestrada2011r,
  title = {Construcción de la escala de reserva cognitiva en población española: estudio piloto},
  shorttitle = {Construcción de la escala de reserva cognitiva en población española},
  author = {León Estrada, Irene and García García, Juan and Roldán Tapia, Lola},
  date = {2011},
  journaltitle = {Revista de Neurología},
  shortjournal = {RevNeurol},
  volume = {52},
  number = {11},
  pages = {653},
  issn = {0210-0010},
  doi = {10.33588/rn.5211.2010704},
  url = {https://www.neurologia.com/articulo/2010704},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/MF6KJ3HX/León Estrada et al. - 2011 - Construcción de la escala de reserva cognitiva en .pdf}
}

@article{levenson,
  ids = {levenson1974jopa},
  title = {Activism and {{Powerful Others}}: {{Distinctions}} within the {{Concept}} of {{Internal-External Control}}},
  author = {Levenson, Hanna},
  pages = {9},
  doi = {10.1080/00223891.1974.10119988},
  abstract = {Some studies report that activists are Internals, while others claim they are Externals, holding a belief in chance, fate, and powerful others. Three new scales were constructed in order to measure belief in chance (0as separate from expectancy for control by powerful others (P),and perceived mastery over one’s personal life (I). Two studies are reported. (1.) As predicted, responses from 9 6 adults indicated that only a belief in chance was differentially related t o involvement and information on anti-pollution activities. (2.) In factor analyzing the responses of 329 college males to the 24 items of the new scales, three main factors were identified - I , P,and C. The validity and usefulness of the tripartite division in clarifying past findings regarding the multidimensionality of I-E were discussed.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Levenson/Levenson_Activism and Powerful Others.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/MUZ9LXME/Levenson - 1974 - Activism and Powerful Others Distinctions within .pdf}
}

@article{lins,
  title = {To {{Think}}, to {{Feel}}, to {{Have}}: {{The Effects}} of {{Need}} for {{Cognition}}, {{Hedonism}} and {{Materialism}} on {{Impulse Buying Tendencies}} in {{Adolescents}}},
  author = {Lins, Samuel and Bottequin, Ezra and Dóka, Ádám and Golasa, Agata and Hylander, Frida and Merchán, Ana and Odabaši, Ana and Pavlovi, Sara},
  doi = {10.5334/jeps.bh},
  abstract = {In industrialized countries, teenagers are likely to engage in consumerism, given the influence of their peers and the media. Consumer behaviour is often irrational, as shown by research on impulse buying. An impulse buying tendency (IBT) is characterized by hedonic shopping motivation, materialism and need for cognition (NC). We hypothesize (1) that hedonism mediates the relationship between materialism and IBT; (2) a negative correlation between NC and IBT; (3) that NC moderates the relationship between hedonism and IBT, as well as between materialism and IBT. We will collect data from six countries with participants being adolescents 13–18 years old.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/B44JNZBG/Lins et al. - To Think, to Feel, to Have The Effects of Need fo.pdf}
}

@article{lipkus2001mdm,
  ids = {lipkus2001mdma},
  title = {General {{Performance}} on a {{Numeracy Scale}} among {{Highly Educated Samples}}},
  author = {Lipkus, Isaac M. and Samsa, Greg and Rimer, Barbara K.},
  date = {2001-02},
  journaltitle = {Medical Decision Making},
  volume = {21},
  number = {1},
  pages = {37--44},
  issn = {0272-989X, 1552-681X},
  doi = {10.1177/0272989X0102100105},
  url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0102100105},
  urldate = {2020-06-21},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Lipkus et al/Lipkus et al_2001_General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Z7998UEM/Lipkus et al. - 2001 - General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among High.pdf}
}

@article{lovibond1995brat,
  ids = {lovibond1995brata},
  title = {The Structure of Negative Emotional States: {{Comparison}} of the {{Depression Anxiety Stress Scales}} ({{DASS}}) with the {{Beck Depression}} and {{Anxiety Inventories}}},
  shorttitle = {The Structure of Negative Emotional States},
  author = {Lovibond, P.F. and Lovibond, S.H.},
  date = {1995-03},
  journaltitle = {Behaviour Research and Therapy},
  shortjournal = {Behaviour Research and Therapy},
  volume = {33},
  number = {3},
  pages = {335--343},
  issn = {00057967},
  doi = {10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/000579679400075U},
  urldate = {2022-04-29},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Lovibond_Lovibond/Lovibond_Lovibond_1995_The structure of negative emotional states.pdf;/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Lovibond_Lovibond/Lovibond_Lovibond_1995_The structure of negative emotional states2.pdf;/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Lovibond_Lovibond/Lovibond_Lovibond_1995_The structure of negative emotional states3.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Z6VSFHVB/Lovibond and Lovibond - 1995 - The structure of negative emotional states Compar.pdf}
}

@article{lyon2022is,
  title = {Leading the Charge in the Education Sector: Development and Validation of the {{School Implementation Leadership Scale}} ({{SILS}})},
  shorttitle = {Leading the Charge in the Education Sector},
  author = {Lyon, Aaron R. and Corbin, Catherine M. and Brown, Eric C. and Ehrhart, Mark G. and Locke, Jill and Davis, Chayna and Picozzi, Elissa and Aarons, Gregory A. and Cook, Clayton R.},
  date = {2022-07-19},
  journaltitle = {Implementation Science},
  shortjournal = {Implementation Sci},
  volume = {17},
  number = {1},
  pages = {48},
  issn = {1748-5908},
  doi = {10.1186/s13012-022-01222-7},
  url = {https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-022-01222-7},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Background:\hspace{0.6em} Strategic implementation leadership is a critical determinant of successful implementation, hypothesized to create a more supportive implementation climate conducive to the adoption and use of evidence-based practices. Implementation leadership behaviors may vary significantly across contexts, necessitating studies that examine the validity of established measurement tools in novel health service delivery sectors. The education sector is the most common site for delivering mental health services to children and adolescents in the USA, but research focused on implementation leadership in schools is in the early phases, and there is a need for adaptation and expansion of instruments in order to tailor to the school context. The current study adapted and validated the School Implementation Leadership Scale (SILS) (based on the Implementation Leadership Scale) in a sample of elementary school personnel from six school districts who were implementing one of two well-established prevention programs for supporting children’s mental health. Methods:\hspace{0.6em} Participants were 441 public school teachers from 52 elementary schools in the Midwest and West Coast of the USA. Participants completed a survey that contained: (1) an adapted and expanded version of the SILS with additional items generated for four existing subscales as well as three new subscales (communication, vision/mission, and availability), and (2) additional tools to evaluate convergent and divergent validity (i.e., measures of general/molar leadership and teaching attitudes). Data underwent (1) examination of item characteristic curves to reduce items and ensure a pragmatic instrument, (2) confirmatory factor analyses to establish structural validity, and (3) evaluation of convergent and divergent validity. Results:\hspace{0.6em} Item reduction analyses resulted in seven subscales of three items each. Results indicated acceptable fit for a seven-factor structural model (CFI = .995, TLI = .99, RMSEA = .07, SRMR = 0.02). Second-order factor loadings were high (λ = .89 to .96), suggesting that the SILS subscales comprise a higher-order implementation leadership factor. All subscales demonstrated good inter-item reliability (α = .91–.96). Convergent and divergent validity results were generally as hypothesized, with moderate to high correlations between SILS subscales and general leadership, moderate correlations with teaching attitudes, and low correlations with school demographics. Conclusions:\hspace{0.6em} Overall, results provided strong structural, convergent, and divergent validity evidence for the 21-item, 7-factor SILS instrument. Implications for the measurement of implementation leadership in schools are discussed,},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/IST96CMJ/Lyon et al. - 2022 - Leading the charge in the education sector develo.pdf}
}

@article{mann1997jbdm,
  ids = {mann1997jbdma},
  title = {The {{Melbourne}} Decision Making Questionnaire: An Instrument for Measuring Patterns for Coping with Decisional Conflict},
  shorttitle = {The {{Melbourne}} Decision Making Questionnaire},
  author = {Mann, Leon and Burnett, Paul and Radford, Mark and Ford, Steve},
  date = {1997-03},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Behavioral Decision Making},
  shortjournal = {J. Behav. Decis. Making},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1--19},
  issn = {0894-3257, 1099-0771},
  doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<1::AID-BDM242>3.0.CO;2-X},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<1::AID-BDM242>3.0.CO;2-X},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {A study was conducted to examine the factorial validity of the Flinders Decision Making Questionnaire (Mann, 1982), a 31-item self-report inventory designed to measure tendencies to use three major coping patterns identi®ed in the con¯ict theory of decision making (Janis and Mann, 1977): vigilance, hypervigilance, and defensive avoidance (procrastination, buck-passing, and rationalization). A sample of 2051 university students, comprising samples from Australia (n ˆ 262), New Zealand (n ˆ 260), the USA (n ˆ 475), Japan (n ˆ 359), Hong Kong (n ˆ 281) and Taiwan (n ˆ 414) was administered the DMQ. Factorial validity of the instrument was tested by con®rmatory factor analysis with LISREL. Five di€erent substantive models, representing di€erent structural relationships between the decision-coping patterns had unsatisfactory ®t to the data and could not be validated. A shortened instrument, containing 22 items, yielded a revised model comprising four identi®able factors Ð vigilance, hypervigilance, buck-passing, and procrastination. The revised model had adequate ®t with data for each country sample and for the total sample, and was con®rmed. It is recommended that the 22-item instrument, named the Melbourne DMQ, replace the Flinders DMQ for measurement of decision-coping patterns. *c 1997 by John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Mann et al/Mann et al_1997_The Melbourne decision making questionnaire.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BUPABJ3A/Mann et al. - 1997 - The Melbourne decision making questionnaire an in.pdf}
}

@article{maria,
  title = {Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg en universitarios chilenos},
  author = {María, Ana and Atenas, Celis and Villarroel, Vera},
  abstract = {PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE ROSENBERG’S SELF-ESTEEM SCALE IN CHILEAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS The present research worked with Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSS), an instrument that has been widely applied to investigation in psychology and psychiatry, which is easy to apply and homologates in diverse culture and languages, and an instrument that has not been adapted to Chile before. The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the RSS are analyzed, in a sample of 462 university students, who were assessed during the academic year. The results show an elevated mean self-esteem in women as well as in men in the sample, with no significant differences between genders. The internal consistency of the instrument is appropriate, as well as the split-half consistency criterion. Regarding construct validity, an exploratory factor analysis confirmed the dimensional structure that was predicted theoretically. The preliminary analysis seems to confirm in general, that the psychometric properties of this scale are appropriate for the population of university students. Also, its simple application, sustains its use in the context of Chilean Universities.},
  langid = {spanish},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/I5H4ZDST/María et al. - Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Autoesti.pdf}
}

@article{mezzadra2017,
  ids = {mezzadra2017e,mezzadra2017ea},
  title = {Validación de la Escala Abreviada de Afrontamiento Religioso Brief-RCOPE en el Contexto Argentino en estudiantes de confesión católica},
  author = {Mezzadra, Joaquín and Simkin, Hugo},
  date = {2017},
  pages = {11},
  doi = {10.35670/1667-4545.v17.n1.17071},
  abstract = {Currently, the study of religious coping is one of the main lines of research in psychology of religion. Since there is a lack of instruments in the Argentinean context, this study aims to adapt and validate the Brief Religious Coping Scale (B-RCOPE), one of the most widely used techniques for empirical evaluation. 200 students of both genders from secondary catholic schools in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires participated in this study. According to our results, confirmatory factor analysis presents an adequate fit to the data, similar to those reported in other studies. Internal consistency was acceptable for both positive and negative coping. Results indicate that B-RCOPE has adequate psychometric characteristics for use within an Argentinean context.},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Mezzadra_Simkin/Mezzadra_Simkin_2017_Validacion de la Escala Abreviada de Afrontamiento Religioso Brief-RCOPE en el.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/8FUMQZQH/Mezzadra and Simkin - 2017 - Validación de la Escala Abreviada de Afrontamiento.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BERJNUC7/Mezzadra and Simkin - 2017 - Validación de la Escala Abreviada de Afrontamiento.pdf}
}

@article{moodley2012rt,
  ids = {moodley2012rta},
  title = {Factor {{Analysis}} of the {{Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire Using}} a {{Sample}} of {{South African Adolescents}}},
  author = {Moodley, Trevor and Esterhuyse, Karel G. F. and Beukes, Roelf B. I.},
  date = {2012},
  journaltitle = {Religion \& Theology},
  shortjournal = {Religion Theol},
  volume = {19},
  number = {1-2},
  pages = {122--151},
  issn = {1023-0807, 1574-3012},
  doi = {10.1163/157430112X650339},
  url = {https://brill.com/view/journals/rt/19/1-2/article-p122_7.xml},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {In 2003 Gomez and Fisher developed the Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) based on a theoretical model of spiritual well-being proposed by Fisher. According to Fisher, spiritual wellbeing comprises the personal, communal, environmental and transcendental domains, which are interrelated and cohere to create a global spiritual well-being dimension. Their study showed that the SWBQ was reliable and valid. A further study in 2005 using item response theory analysis of the SWBQ suggested general support for the psychometric properties of the SWBQ. However, there were indications that certain items in the questionnaire needed to be improved. The present study was undertaken to do a factor analysis of the SWBQ using a sample of South African adolescents to gauge its suitability. Gomez and Fisher’s recommendation was considered and certain items were added to the SWBQ for factor analysis with the aim of replacing some of the original items. The factor structure that was found in this study corresponds with that in Gomez and Fisher’s study. Acceptable coefffijicients of internal consistency for the diffferent subscales (factors) and for the global score of the SWBQ were found. Moreover, in line with Gomez and Fisher’s recommendation, this revised SWBQ scale seems to have been improved in terms of its psychometric properties and appears to be a reliable instrument in measuring the spiritual well-being of adolescents.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Moodley et al/Moodley et al_2012_Factor Analysis of the Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire Using a Sample of.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/T4N4KG5G/Moodley et al. - 2012 - Factor Analysis of the Spiritual Well-being Questi.pdf}
}

@article{morejon2004,
  title = {Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: fiabilidad y validez en población clínica española},
  author = {Morejón, Antonio J VÁZQUEZ and García-Bóveda, Rosa JIMÉNEZ and Jiménez, Raquel VÁZQUEZ-MOREJÓN},
  date = {2004},
  volume = {22},
  abstract = {Reliability and validity of a Spanish adaptation of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) were studied on a sample of 533 outpatients treated at the Community Mental Healh Center. Results confirm a high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Likewise the data shows the validity – constructs validity and known-groups validity- of the instrument. The ease of the application of this test and their acceptable psychometric characteristics are an important support for clinical use.},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/K9HBEUBT/Morejón et al. - 2004 - Escala de autoestima de Rosenberg fiabilidad y val.pdf}
}

@article{pargament1998jssr,
  ids = {pargament1998jftssor,pargament1998jftssora},
  title = {Patterns of {{Positive}} and {{Negative Religious Coping}} with {{Major Life Stressors}}},
  author = {Pargament, Kenneth I. and Smith, Bruce W. and Koenig, Harold G. and Perez, Lisa},
  date = {1998},
  journaltitle = {Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion},
  volume = {37},
  number = {4},
  eprint = {1388152},
  eprinttype = {jstor},
  pages = {710--724},
  doi = {10.2307/1388152},
  url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/1388152},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Pargament et al/Pargament et al_1998_Patterns of Positive and Negative Religious Coping with Major Life Stressors.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4S2MCHWM/CRQ_es-ES2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5FL3ZZYR/CRQ_es-ES3.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BASK8I2K/CTT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CGXVI8IR/PSPPC.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ECVK7YBT/CRQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EWMNEE9C/Pargament et al. - 1998 - Patterns of Positive and Negative Religious Coping.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/IZCCDU3L/BNT_esp.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/J3M8I382/CRS.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/K6NDRQ9W/PBSr_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KW324KP7/BDI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/M37HULIU/PBSr_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/MC9TZZQ6/HRPVB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NHJE749J/LSNS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/UEMZEH7S/Pargament et al. - 1998 - Patterns of Positive and Negative Religious Coping.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VSTX26JL/bRCOPE_Arg.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VTHFR3IX/CS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/WKHG4IJF/bRCOPE.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/X6EKLNPZ/CS_es-CL.pdf}
}

@article{perez-albeniz,
  title = {Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español},
  author = {Pérez-Albéniz, Alicia and family=Paúl, given=Joaquín, prefix=de, useprefix=true and Etxeberría, Juan},
  langid = {spanish},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NDTX8I8G/Pérez-Albéniz et al. - Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI).pdf}
}

@article{plante1997pp,
  ids = {plante1997ppa},
  title = {The {{Santa Clara Strength}} of {{Religious Faith Questionnaire}}},
  author = {Plante, Thomas G. and Boccaccini, Marcus T.},
  date = {1997-05},
  journaltitle = {Pastoral Psychology},
  shortjournal = {Pastoral Psychol},
  volume = {45},
  number = {5},
  pages = {375--387},
  issn = {0031-2789, 1573-6679},
  doi = {10.1007/BF02230993},
  url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02230993},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Plante_Boccaccini/Plante_Boccaccini_1997_The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GAGN9WXC/Plante and Boccaccini - 1997 - The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questi.pdf}
}

@article{pommier2020a,
  title = {The {{Development}} and {{Validation}} of the {{Compassion Scale}}},
  author = {Pommier, Elizabeth and Neff, Kristin D. and Tóth-Király, István},
  date = {2020-01},
  journaltitle = {Assessment},
  shortjournal = {Assessment},
  volume = {27},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21--39},
  issn = {1073-1911, 1552-3489},
  doi = {10.1177/1073191119874108},
  url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191119874108},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {This article presents a measure of compassion for others called the Compassion Scale (CS), which is based on Neff’s theoretical model of self-compassion. Compassion was operationalized as experiencing kindness, a sense of common humanity, mindfulness, and lessened indifference toward the suffering of others. Study 1 (n = 465) describes the development of potential scale items and the final 16 CS items chosen based on results from analyses using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Study 2 (n = 510) cross-validates the CS in a second student sample. Study 3 (n = 80) establishes test–retest reliability. Study 4 (n = 1,394) replicates results with a community sample, while Study 5 (n = 172) replicates results with a sample of meditators. Study 6 (n = 913) examines the finalized version of the CS in a community sample. Evidence regarding reliability, discriminant, convergent, construct, and known-groups validity for the CS is provided.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XH5IWMGP/Pommier et al. - 2020 - The Development and Validation of the Compassion S.pdf}
}

@article{pons,
  title = {{{CULTIVATING HEALTHY MINDS AND OPEN HEARTS}}: {{A MIXED-METHOD CONTROLLED STUDY ON THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND RELATIONAL EFFECTS OF COMPASSION CULTIVATION TRAINING IN CHILE}}},
  author = {Pons, Gonzalo Brito},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7SBTD7RB/Pons - CULTIVATING HEALTHY MINDS AND OPEN HEARTS A MIXED.pdf}
}

@article{psoteg,
  title = {Decision-Making Patterns, Conflict Sytles, and Self-Esteem},
  author = {Psoteg, Coden},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/73I2SKG3/Psoteg - Decision-making patterns, conflict sytles, and sel.pdf}
}

@article{reyna2016rp,
  ids = {reyna2016p},
  title = {Psychometric Study of the {{Rational Experiential Inventory}} among Undergraduate {{Argentinean}} Students},
  author = {Reyna, Cecilia},
  date = {2016},
  journaltitle = {Revista de Psicología},
  volume = {34},
  pages = {19},
  doi = {10.18800/psico.201602.005},
  abstract = {The Rational Experiential Inventory consist of two large scales (rational and experiential), each one with two subscales (ability and engagement). Their psychometric properties have been studied in several countries, but there are no reports in the Latin American context. In this study we analyzed the factor structure and internal consistency of the Rational Experiential Inventory, and assessed the relationships between processing styles and different personality dimensions in a sample of students from Argentina. The results show an underlying twofactor structure with good internal consistency values. Only one significant relationship between experiential style and extraversion was observed. A version with fewer items was attained and, due to its adequate psychometric properties, this instrument may be used in future research studies.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Reyna/Reyna_2016_Psychometric study of the Rational Experiential Inventory among undergraduate.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CKF5N38S/Reyna and Ortiz - 2016 - Psychometric study of the Rational Experiential In.pdf}
}

@article{rojas-barahona2009rmc,
  ids = {rojas-barahona2009rmca},
  title = {La escala de autoestima de Rosenberg: Validación para Chile en una muestra de jóvenes adultos, adultos y adultos mayores},
  shorttitle = {La escala de autoestima de Rosenberg},
  author = {Rojas-Barahona, Cristian A and Zegers P, Beatriz and Förster M, Carla E},
  date = {2009-06},
  journaltitle = {Revista médica de Chile},
  volume = {137},
  number = {6},
  issn = {0034-9887},
  doi = {10.4067/S0034-98872009000600009},
  url = {http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872009000600009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en},
  urldate = {2020-06-21},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Rojas-Barahona et al/Rojas-Barahona et al_2009_La escala de autoestima de Rosenberg.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XNLUNNL5/Rojas-Barahona et al. - 2009 - La escala de autoestima de Rosenberg Validación p.pdf}
}

@article{ruiz2017pr,
  title = {General {{Health Questionnaire-12}} Validity in {{Colombia}} and Factorial Equivalence between Clinical and Nonclinical Participants},
  author = {Ruiz, Francisco J. and García-Beltrán, Diana M. and Suárez-Falcón, Juan C.},
  date = {2017-10},
  journaltitle = {Psychiatry Research},
  shortjournal = {Psychiatry Research},
  volume = {256},
  pages = {53--58},
  issn = {01651781},
  doi = {10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.020},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165178116321886},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The General Health Questionnaire – 12 (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening self-report for emotional disorders among adults. However, there is little evidence concerning the validity of the GHQ-12 in Colombia and its factorial invariance between nonclinical and clinical samples. Accordingly, the current study aims to explore the GHQ-12 validity in Colombian nonclinical and clinical samples. The GHQ-12 was administered to a total of 1641 participants, including a sample of undergraduates, one of general population, and a clinical sample. The internal consistency of the GHQ-12 across samples was good (overall alpha of .90). The one-factor model showed a good fit to the data and was considered theoretically more coherent than the two-factor model with positive and negative items loading in separate factors. Metric and scalar invariance were observed across nonclinical and clinical samples. The GHQ-12 scores were strongly and positively related to emotional symptoms and experiential avoidance, and negatively related to life satisfaction. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, a threshold score of 11/12 was optimal to identify emotional disorders. In conclusion, the GHQ-12 is a valid screening self-report in Colombia that provides scores that can be compared across clinical and nonclinical participants.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/65RSJ7MD/Ruiz et al. - 2017 - General Health Questionnaire-12 validity in Colomb.pdf}
}

@dataset{rushton2013,
  ids = {rushton2013a},
  title = {Self-{{Report Altruism Scale}}},
  author = {Rushton, J. P. and Chrisjohn, R. D.},
  date = {2013-02-11},
  publisher = {{American Psychological Association}},
  doi = {10.1037/t06160-000},
  url = {http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/t06160-000},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {This paper is divided into two parts. In the first, the rank order stability of individual differences in altruism across situations is examined and it is found that substantial consistency occurs when due regard is given to the principle of aggregation. In the second, a self-report altruism scale, on which respondents rate the frequency with which they have engaged in some 20 specific behaviors, is found to predict such criteria as peer-ratings of altruism, completing an organ-donor card, and paper-and-pencil measures of prosoeial orientation. These data suggest there is a broad-based trait of altruism.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Rushton_Chrisjohn/Rushton_Chrisjohn_2013_Self-Report Altruism Scale.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/27JX432J/CRTMCQ4_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/28XVRWK7/PSPPC.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/2KRGGBU9/IRI_en-US_1.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/35HDP9DH/SWBQ_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/3HPGY3XJ/SBS_en-NZ.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/3KF83G5Z/CS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/3SM86NVY/BNT_en-GE.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/3YJ338UF/BART_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/42PRYDB7/MDMQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4NMX5667/DASS21_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4WXWJYPR/STAI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5H2YLQHF/BNT_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5KHAQ2KB/PWb_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5REATLC7/ERQ_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/5RHPC3UB/WEBEXEC_en-GB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/6HCRBCGG/CAS_en-BR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7USRXU3N/CRQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7UYDCE82/UCLA_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/8E7P6CUR/PBSr_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/8KZSITNY/MDMQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/8WYRGEGD/EAR_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/99VBLFR8/CTT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/9HQJLGK7/PBS_original.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/A74TY2FN/EQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/A8UYWRN3/DASS21_es-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AA4R3LFF/LSNS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AHVRIKC2/PSETPP_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AQUUMVRH/ERQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BEU4TKRV/ESM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BYFQNQEB/ProQOL_en-US_Manual.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/C8JA9DUX/ESV_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CEGRQRFI/UCLA_zh-TW.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DHHIAR74/REI40_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DKR42XA4/bRCOPE_Arg.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/DPY7VEDR/SRSav_en.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/E2XCF9LG/ESZ_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/E5D5STRE/sProQOL_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EB4RKI6K/SRSav_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EILT2K7K/MIS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EK4HHKSA/CRTv_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/EZCFXDUJ/PBSr_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/F56WPQDY/EAR_es-CL2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/F8EGPH2U/SCGT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FERZ9ZND/CRS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FGSTB95T/IRI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FW6C832M/EAR_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FWUVC7KB/ICvsID_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GDLN52F4/IRI_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/HNK5LKUP/BNT_esp.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/HWP74MZ4/EQ_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/IDAENQYD/IRS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/J37QNFNP/HRPVB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KB5Y8RFT/IBT_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KKE923TN/SWBQ_en-ZA.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/KQEHSHV7/CRT7_en-CA.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/LDQUDT4X/CRS.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/LNPTV2KQ/CRQ_es-ES2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/LZ7HESAF/SASS_en-GB.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/MTCVK3WB/AIM_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/NCMZSI9F/sProQOL_es-ES2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/P76ISZ8K/PERMA_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PD9ZK7FZ/DASS21_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PHIKMJKW/bRCOPE_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/PYE3DPEM/GHQ12_en-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/R9HH8VF5/BDI_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RAKJIJDY/SCSORF_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RIA25UGE/SILS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/S2XFIW37/RTS_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/S8BDW7W4/ESM_pt-BR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SHRLUE4Y/CS_es-CL.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SMSN6JRU/ERQ_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SUCP5EFZ/bRCOPE.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SWP7W9AI/GHQ12_es-CO.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/SZNADP68/ERQ_en-IT-GR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/TNRVPIBB/MDDF_en-UK.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/TQGG257Y/PWb_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/TUPRST75/RSS_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/U68A7I2H/DASS21_en-AU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/U7SD8PVP/MIS_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/UJ3B6W3I/EmpaTom_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/URXY6GKD/OBJNUM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/V347URIN/fauxPasEv_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VBMT5AV3/sProQOL_es-ES.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VBZXL8BC/bRCOPE_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VDTGT5SF/GHQ12_es-CU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VISL3DKK/REI40_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/VUDEB92E/CIT_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/WB28L2FE/SRA_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XITXMTP8/IEC_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Y8SNHIE3/PRFBM_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/YRMSLRW8/PSS_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/Z9TZQM5Y/CRQ_es-ES3.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZD8J8JFT/REI40_es-AR.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZFIETBEF/COVIDCONTROL_en-EU.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZLSIPKFP/HRPVBpost.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZQ7KKE4L/ESV_Sam_en-US.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZZZ9WZ9Z/UCLA_es-CO.pdf}
}

@article{ryff,
  title = {The {{Structure}} of {{Psychological Well-Being Revisited}}},
  author = {Ryff, Carol D and Keyes, Corey Lee M},
  doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/J3UN7XHJ/Ryff and Keyes - The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisite.pdf}
}

@article{sala2012ejodp,
  title = {Measurement Invariance of the {{Emotion Regulation Questionnaire}} ({{ERQ}}). {{A}} Cross-National Validity Study},
  author = {Sala, Maria Nives and Molina, Paola and Abler, Birgit and Kessler, Henrik and Vanbrabant, Leonard and Van De Schoot, Rens},
  date = {2012-11},
  journaltitle = {European Journal of Developmental Psychology},
  shortjournal = {European Journal of Developmental Psychology},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {751--757},
  issn = {1740-5629, 1740-5610},
  doi = {10.1080/17405629.2012.690604},
  url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17405629.2012.690604},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/6WWDTREF/Sala et al. - 2012 - Measurement invariance of the Emotion Regulation Q.pdf}
}

@article{sanchez-lopez2008p,
  title = {The 12-{{Item General Health Questionnaire}} ({{GHQ-12}}): Reliability, External Validity and Factor Structure in the {{Spanish}} Population},
  shorttitle = {The 12-{{Item General Health Questionnaire}} ({{GHQ-12}})},
  author = {Sánchez-López, María del Pilar and Dresch, Virginia},
  date = {2008-11},
  journaltitle = {Psicothema},
  shortjournal = {Psicothema},
  volume = {20},
  number = {4},
  eprint = {18940092},
  eprinttype = {pmid},
  pages = {839--843},
  issn = {0214-9915},
  abstract = {The purpose of this study was to analyze the internal consistency and the external and structure validity of the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Spanish general population. A stratified sample of 1001 subjects, ages between 25 and 65 years, taken from the general Spanish population was employed. The GHQ-12 and the Inventory of Situations and Responses of Anxiety-ISRA were administered. A Cronbach's alpha of .76 (Standardized Alpha: .78) and a 3-factor structure (with oblique rotation and maximum likelihood procedure) were obtained. External validity of Factor I (Successful Coping) with the ISRA is very robust (.82; Factor II, .70; Factor III, .75). The GHQ-12 shows adequate reliability and validity in the Spanish population. Therefore, the GHQ-12 can be used with efficacy to assess people's overall psychological well-being and to detect non-psychotic psychiatric problems. Additionally, our results confirm that the GHQ-12 can best be thought of as a multidimensional scale that assesses several distinct aspects of distress, rather than just a unitary screening measure.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {{Factor Analysis, Statistical},Health Status,Health Status Indicators,Humans,Population Surveillance,Reproducibility of Results,Spain,Surveys and Questionnaires},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Sánchez-López_Dresch/Sanchez-Lopez_Dresch_2008_The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).pdf}
}

@thesis{sanchez2008,
  title = {Diferencias individuales en el razonamiento y la toma de decisiones: estudio de la capacidad predictiva del rational experiential inventory y del nivel de formación matemática},
  author = {Sanchez, Edgar},
  date = {2008},
  institution = {{Universitat de Barcelona}},
  location = {{Barcelona}},
  langid = {spanish},
  pagetotal = {139},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Sanchez/Sanchez_2008_Diferencias individuales en el razonamiento y la toma de decisiones.pdf}
}

@article{silva2020cp,
  ids = {silva2022cp},
  title = {{{COVID-19}} Anxiety Scale ({{CAS}}): {{Development}} and Psychometric Properties},
  shorttitle = {{{COVID-19}} Anxiety Scale ({{CAS}})},
  author = {Silva, Washington Allysson Dantas and family=Sampaio Brito, given=Tátila Rayane, prefix=de, useprefix=true and Pereira, Cicero Roberto},
  date = {2020-11-13},
  journaltitle = {Current Psychology},
  shortjournal = {Curr Psychol},
  issn = {1046-1310, 1936-4733},
  doi = {10.1007/s12144-020-01195-0},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-020-01195-0},
  urldate = {2022-04-27},
  abstract = {The objective of the present research is to develop and validate the COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS). We conducted three studies to gather evidence regarding content and construct validity, as well to evaluate the reliability of the measure. Study 1 is subdivided into two studies. In Study 1a, we analyze the content validity of the new measure through content expert analysis (N = 10 expert raters). In Study 1b (N = 30), we perform a pilot study with a sample from the target population. In Study 2 (N = 352), we explored the unifactorial structure of the measure, and analyzed its internal consistency verified. Finally, in Study 3 (N = 200), we assess the adequacy of the factor structure and gather evidence on convergent-discriminant validity and gender-scale invariance. In summary, our results demonstrate that CAS is a reliable and adequate instrument to assess COVID-19 related anxiety.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Silva et al/Silva et al_2020_COVID-19 anxiety scale (CAS).pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/IGMQ7IZX/Silva et al. - 2022 - COVID-19 anxiety scale (CAS) Development and psyc.pdf}
}

@article{sirota2018brm,
  ids = {sirota2018br},
  title = {Effect of Response Format on Cognitive Reflection: {{Validating}} a Two- and Four-Option Multiple Choice Question Version of the {{Cognitive Reflection Test}}},
  shorttitle = {Effect of Response Format on Cognitive Reflection},
  author = {Sirota, Miroslav and Juanchich, Marie},
  date = {2018-12},
  journaltitle = {Behavior Research Methods},
  volume = {50},
  number = {6},
  pages = {2511--2522},
  issn = {1554-3528},
  doi = {10.3758/s13428-018-1029-4},
  url = {http://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-018-1029-4},
  urldate = {2020-06-21},
  abstract = {The Cognitive Reflection Test, measuring intuition inhibition and cognitive reflection, has become extremely popular because it reliably predicts reasoning performance, decision-making, and beliefs. Across studies, the response format of CRT items sometimes differs, based on the assumed construct equivalence of tests with open-ended versus multiple-choice items (the equivalence hypothesis). Evidence and theoretical reasons, however, suggest that the cognitive processes measured by these response formats and their associated performances might differ (the nonequivalence hypothesis). We tested the two hypotheses experimentally by assessing the performance in tests with different response formats and by comparing their predictive and construct validity. In a between-subjects experiment (n = 452), participants answered stem-equivalent CRT items in an open-ended, a two-option, or a four-option response format and then completed tasks on belief bias, denominator neglect, and paranormal beliefs (benchmark indicators of predictive validity), as well as on actively open-minded thinking and numeracy (benchmark indicators of construct validity). We found no significant differences between the three response formats in the numbers of correct responses, the numbers of intuitive responses (with the exception of the two-option version, which had a higher number than the other tests), and the correlational patterns of the indicators of predictive and construct validity. All three test versions were similarly reliable, but the multiple-choice formats were completed more quickly. We speculate that the specific nature of the CRT items helps build construct equivalence among the different response formats. We recommend using the validated multiple-choice version of the CRT presented here, particularly the four-option CRT, for practical and methodological reasons. Supplementary materials and data are available at https://osf.io/mzhyc/.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Sirota_Juanchich/Sirota_Juanchich_2018_Effect of response format on cognitive reflection.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/AJIJZK2X/Sirota and Juanchich - 2018 - Effect of response format on cognitive reflection.pdf}
}

@article{sirota2020jbdm,
  ids = {sirota2021bdm,sirota2021jbdm},
  title = {Measuring Cognitive Reflection without Maths: {{Development}} and Validation of the Verbal Cognitive Reflection Test},
  shorttitle = {Measuring Cognitive Reflection without Maths},
  author = {Sirota, Miroslav and Dewberry, Chris and Juanchich, Marie and Valuš, Lenka and Marshall, Amanda C.},
  date = {2020-10-28},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Behavioral Decision Making},
  issn = {0894-3257, 1099-0771},
  doi = {10.1002/bdm.2213},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.2213},
  urldate = {2020-11-09},
  abstract = {The cognitive reflection test (CRT) became popular for its impressive power to predict how well people reason and make decisions. Despite the popularity of the CRT, a major issue complicates its interpretation: The numerical nature of the CRT confounds reflection ability with mathematical ability. We have addressed this issue by developing the verbal CRT (CRT-V), a novel 10-item measure of cognitive reflection (https://osf.io/xehbv/), using nonmathematical problems with good statistical and psychometric properties and with low familiarity. First, we selected suitable items with relatively low familiarity and optimal difficulty as identified in two different populations (Studies 1 and 2) and with high content validity as judged by an expert panel (Study 3). Second, we demonstrated good criterion and construct validity for the test in different populations with a wide range of variables (Studies 4–6, 8) and a good internal consistency (Studies 4–8) and test–retest reliability (Study 7). The CRTV was less associated with math anxiety, objective and subjective numeracy than the original CRT, and it was test equivalent across gender, age groups and administration setting. In contrast with the original CRT (Hedge's g = 0.29, 95\% confidence interval [CI] [0.17, 0.40]), the CRT-V showed no gender differences (Hedge's g = −0.06, 95\% CI [−0.18, 0.06]). The CRT-V can complement existing, numerical, tests of cognitive reflection.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {CRT},
  annotation = {ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Sirota et al/Sirota et al_2020_Measuring cognitive reflection without maths.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/TF5MWYCL/Sirota et al. - 2021 - Measuring cognitive reflection without maths Deve.pdf}
}

@article{stahl2016po,
  ids = {stahl2016poa},
  title = {Moralized {{Rationality}}: {{Relying}} on {{Logic}} and {{Evidence}} in the {{Formation}} and {{Evaluation}} of {{Belief Can Be Seen}} as a {{Moral Issue}}},
  shorttitle = {Moralized {{Rationality}}},
  author = {Ståhl, Tomas and Zaal, Maarten P. and Skitka, Linda J.},
  editor = {Bastian, Brock},
  date = {2016-11-16},
  journaltitle = {PLOS ONE},
  volume = {11},
  number = {11},
  pages = {e0166332},
  issn = {1932-6203},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0166332},
  url = {https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166332},
  urldate = {2020-06-21},
  abstract = {In the present article we demonstrate stable individual differences in the extent to which a reliance on logic and evidence in the formation and evaluation of beliefs is perceived as a moral virtue, and a reliance on less rational processes is perceived as a vice. We refer to this individual difference variable as moralized rationality. Eight studies are reported in which an instrument to measure individual differences in moralized rationality is validated. Results show that the Moralized Rationality Scale (MRS) is internally consistent, and captures something distinct from the personal importance people attach to being rational (Studies 1–3). Furthermore, the MRS has high test-retest reliability (Study 4), is conceptually distinct from frequently used measures of individual differences in moral values, and it is negatively related to common beliefs that are not supported by scientific evidence (Study 5). We further demonstrate that the MRS predicts morally laden reactions, such as a desire for punishment, of people who rely on irrational (vs. rational) ways of forming and evaluating beliefs (Studies 6 and 7). Finally, we show that the MRS uniquely predicts motivation to contribute to a charity that works to prevent the spread of irrational beliefs (Study 8). We conclude that (1) there are stable individual differences in the extent to which people moralize a reliance on rationality in the formation and evaluation of beliefs, (2) that these individual differences do not reduce to the personal importance attached to rationality, and (3) that individual differences in moralized rationality have important motivational and interpersonal consequences.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Ståhl et al/Stahl et al_2016_Moralized Rationality.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/UWBUD78N/Ståhl et al. - 2016 - Moralized Rationality Relying on Logic and Eviden.pdf}
}

@article{stamm,
  title = {Self-scoring directions Research Information on the ProQOL – CSF-vIV: Professional Quality of Life: Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Subscales},
  author = {Stamm, B Hudnall},
  langid = {spanish},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/RXA5VVQH/Stamm - Self-scoring directions Research Information on th.pdf}
}

@article{stoll2016srh,
  ids = {stoll2016s&rh},
  title = {Cross-Cultural Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Measure to Assess Fear of Childbirth Prior to Pregnancy},
  author = {Stoll, Kathrin and Hauck, Yvonne and Downe, Soo and Edmonds, Joyce and Gross, Mechthild M. and Malott, Anne and McNiven, Patricia and Swift, Emma and Thomson, Gillian and Hall, Wendy A.},
  date = {2016-06},
  journaltitle = {Sexual \& Reproductive Healthcare},
  volume = {8},
  pages = {49--54},
  issn = {18775756},
  doi = {10.1016/j.srhc.2016.02.004},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877575616000227},
  urldate = {2020-11-09},
  langid = {english},
  annotation = {ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Stoll et al/Stoll et al_2016_Cross-cultural development and psychometric evaluation of a measure to assess.pdf;/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Stoll et al/Stoll et al_2016_Cross-cultural development and psychometric evaluation of a measure to assess2.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/FN7W9922/Stoll et al. - 2016 - Cross-cultural development and psychometric evalua.pdf}
}

@article{stone1998jocn,
  title = {Frontal {{Lobe Contributions}} to {{Theory}} of {{Mind}}},
  author = {Stone, Valerie E. and Baron-Cohen, Simon and Knight, Robert T.},
  date = {1998-09},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
  shortjournal = {Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {640--656},
  issn = {0898-929X, 1530-8898},
  doi = {10.1162/089892998562942},
  url = {https://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/10/5/640-656/3311},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {“Theory of mind,” the ability to make inferences about others' mental states, seems to be a modular cognitive capacity that underlies humans' ability to engage in complex social interaction. It develops in several distinct stages, which can be measured with social reasoning tests of increasing difficulty. Individuals with Asperger's syndrome, a mild form of autism, perform well on simpler theory of mind tests but show deficits on more developmentally advanced theory of mind tests. We tested patients with bilateral damage to orbito-frontal cortex (n = 5) and unilateral damage in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 5) on a series of theory of mind tasks varying in difficulty. Bilateral orbito-frontal lesion patients performed similarly to individuals with Asperger's syndrome, performing well on simpler tests and showing deficits on tasks requiring more subtle social reasoning, such as the ability to recognize a faux pas. In contrast, no specific theory of mind deficits were evident in the unilateral dorsolateral frontal lesion patients. The dorsolateral lesion patients had difficulty only on versions of the tasks that placed demands on working memory.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/7R3SKLU7/Stone et al. - 1998 - Frontal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind.pdf}
}

@article{tobacyk,
  ids = {louisianatechuniversity2004i},
  title = {A {{Revised Paranormal Belief Scale}}},
  author = {Tobacyk, Jerome J},
  pages = {6},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {❓ Multiple DOI},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Tobacyk/Tobacyk_A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/MREB4I6J/Louisiana Tech University and Tobacyk - 2004 - A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.pdf}
}

@article{tobacyka,
  title = {Belief in {{Paranormal Phenomena}}: {{Assessment Instrument Development}} and {{Implications}} for {{Personality Functioning}}},
  author = {Tobacyk, Jerome and Milford, Gary},
  doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1029},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/ZZ6NTD62/Tobacyk and Milford - Belief in Paranormal Phenomena Assessment Instrum.pdf}
}

@article{toplak2013tr,
  ids = {toplak,toplak2014t&r},
  title = {Assessing Miserly Information Processing: {{An}} Expansion of the {{Cognitive Reflection Test}}},
  shorttitle = {Assessing Miserly Information Processing},
  author = {Toplak, Maggie E. and West, Richard F. and Stanovich, Keith E.},
  date = {2013},
  journaltitle = {Thinking \& Reasoning},
  volume = {20},
  number = {2},
  pages = {147--168},
  issn = {1354-6783, 1464-0708},
  doi = {10.1080/13546783.2013.844729},
  url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729},
  urldate = {2020-06-21},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Toplak et al/Toplak et al_2013_Assessing miserly information processing.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/WTPL7NKM/Toplak et al. - 2014 - Assessing miserly information processing An expan.pdf}
}

@article{vale2012dn,
  ids = {vale2012dna},
  title = {Memory Complaint Scale ({{MCS}}): {{Proposed}} Tool for Active Systematic Search},
  shorttitle = {Memory Complaint Scale ({{MCS}})},
  author = {Vale, Francisco A.C. and Balieiro-Jr, Ari P. and Silva-Filho, José Humberto},
  date = {2012-12},
  journaltitle = {Dementia \& Neuropsychologia},
  shortjournal = {Dement. neuropsychol.},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {212--218},
  issn = {1980-5764},
  doi = {10.1590/S1980-57642012DN06040004},
  url = {http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-57642012000400212&lng=en&tlng=en},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {Subjective Memory Complaints (SMC) are frequent among adults and elderly and are associated with poor quality of life. The etiology and clinical significance of SMCs are unclear, but these complaints are associated with objective cognitive decline or with depression, anxiety and psychosocial stressors. Biological and physiological brain alterations resembling those in Alzheimer’s Disease have been found in SMC. SMC can evolve with different outcomes and represent the initial symptom or a risk factor of dementia. Active systematic search can be useful for early screening of candidates for preventive or therapeutic interventions. Objective: To propose a Memory Complaints Scale (MCS) as an instrument for actively searching for memory complaints and to investigate its utility for discriminating demented from cognitively normal elderly. Methods: A total of 161 patients from a teaching behavioral neurology outpatient unit of a tertiary hospital were studied. The MCS was used in two ways, by direct application to the patient and by application to the patient’s companion. Cognitive tests assessing depression and daily living activities were also applied. Results: High Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were found for the two application methods. Correlations between the two versions and the other instruments administered for patients grouped by type and severity of dementia were also found. Conclusion: The MCS is a useful scale for identifying memory complaints and discriminating demented from cognitively normal elderly. Further studies confirming these findings are warranted.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/CYE7PISI/Vale et al. - 2012 - Memory complaint scale (MCS) Proposed tool for ac.pdf}
}

@article{weeks2019,
  title = {Preference for Caesarean Attitudes toward Birth in a {{Chilean}} Sample of Young Adults},
  author = {Weeks, Fiona H},
  date = {2019},
  pages = {7},
  abstract = {Background: Little empirical research exists about what motivates birth mode preferences, and even less about this topic in Latin America, where obstetric interventions and caesareans are some of the highest worldwide. Aim: To identify factors associated with caesarean preference among Chilean men and women who plan to have children and to inform childbirth education and informed consent procedures. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey measuring attitudes toward birth was administered to graduate students at a large public university in Chile. Eligible students were under the age of 40 and had no children but intended to have children. Logistic regression modelling was used to determine which sociodemographic factors, knowledge and beliefs were associated with caesarean preference. Findings: Among eligible students, 730 responded and 664 provided complete answers to the variables of interest. Respondents had a mean age of 28.8; 38\% were male and 62\% female. Positive attitude toward technological intervention (Odds Ratio 7.4, 95\% Confidence Interval 3.9–14.0), high risk perception of vaginal birth (Odds Ratio 1.8, 95\% Confidence Interval 1.1–2.8), family history of caesarean (Odds Ratio 1.9, 95\% Confidence Interval 1.0–3.8) and high fear of birth (Odds Ratio 3.7, 95\% Confidence Interval 2.0–6.8) were associated with caesarean preference. Discussion: Preference for caesarean birth was highly associated with positive attitudes toward technological intervention and may be related to a lack of knowledge about the realities of caesarean and vaginal birth. Conclusions: Patient-centered education on the relative benefits and risks of birth modes has the potential to influence preferences toward vaginal birth. © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {⛔ No DOI found},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Weeks/Weeks_2019_Preference for caesarean attitudes toward birth in a Chilean sample of young.pdf}
}

@article{weeks2020wab,
  ids = {weeks2020waba,weeks2020wabb,weeks2020wabc,weeks2020wabd},
  title = {Preference for Caesarean and Attitudes toward Birth in a {{Chilean}} Sample of Young Adults},
  author = {Weeks, Fiona H. and Sadler, Michelle and Stoll, Kathrin},
  date = {2020-03},
  journaltitle = {Women and Birth},
  shortjournal = {Women and Birth},
  volume = {33},
  number = {2},
  pages = {e159-e165},
  issn = {18715192},
  doi = {10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.012},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871519218316640},
  urldate = {2021-06-23},
  abstract = {Background: Little empirical research exists about what motivates birth mode preferences, and even less about this topic in Latin America, where obstetric interventions and caesareans are some of the highest worldwide. Aim: To identify factors associated with caesarean preference among Chilean men and women who plan to have children and to inform childbirth education and informed consent procedures. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey measuring attitudes toward birth was administered to graduate students at a large public university in Chile. Eligible students were under the age of 40 and had no children but intended to have children. Logistic regression modelling was used to determine which sociodemographic factors, knowledge and beliefs were associated with caesarean preference. Findings: Among eligible students, 730 responded and 664 provided complete answers to the variables of interest. Respondents had a mean age of 28.8; 38\% were male and 62\% female. Positive attitude toward technological intervention (Odds Ratio 7.4, 95\% Confidence Interval 3.9–14.0), high risk perception of vaginal birth (Odds Ratio 1.8, 95\% Confidence Interval 1.1–2.8), family history of caesarean (Odds Ratio 1.9, 95\% Confidence Interval 1.0–3.8) and high fear of birth (Odds Ratio 3.7, 95\% Confidence Interval 2.0–6.8) were associated with caesarean preference. Discussion: Preference for caesarean birth was highly associated with positive attitudes toward technological intervention and may be related to a lack of knowledge about the realities of caesarean and vaginal birth. Conclusions: Patient-centered education on the relative benefits and risks of birth modes has the potential to influence preferences toward vaginal birth. © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  langid = {english},
  annotation = {ZSCC: 0000004},
  file = {/home/emrys/gorkang@gmail.com/RESEARCH/zotero-library/AUTH/Weeks et al/Weeks et al_2020_Preference for caesarean and attitudes toward birth in a Chilean sample of.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/87T7V42Y/Weeks et al. - 2020 - Preference for caesarean and attitudes toward birt.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/BIU52D55/Weeks et al. - 2020 - Preference for caesarean and attitudes toward birt.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/T32F7KHP/Weeks et al. - 2020 - Preference for caesarean and attitudes toward birt.pdf;/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/W5GFLVSC/Weeks et al. - 2020 - Preference for caesarean and attitudes toward birt.pdf}
}

@article{wu2008paid,
  title = {Psychometric Analysis of the Short-Form {{UCLA Loneliness Scale}} ({{ULS-8}}) in {{Taiwanese}} Undergraduate Students},
  author = {Wu, Chia-huei and Yao, Grace},
  date = {2008-06},
  journaltitle = {Personality and Individual Differences},
  shortjournal = {Personality and Individual Differences},
  volume = {44},
  number = {8},
  pages = {1762--1771},
  issn = {01918869},
  doi = {10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.003},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886908000536},
  urldate = {2023-10-02},
  abstract = {The main purpose of this study was to validate the short-form of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8; Hays \& DiMatteo, 1987) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. A total of 130 undergraduate students participated in this study. Participants completed the ULS-8 in addition to measures of life satisfaction, social support, and adult attachment style. Result of confirmatory factor analysis supported the one-factor model of the ULS-8 with adequate values of various fit indices, revealing that the 8 items of the scale were homogeneous for measuring loneliness. In addition, the ULS-8 had a negative relationship with life satisfaction, and social support; and a positive one with anxiety and avoidant attachment tendency. All the findings showed that the ULS-8 was an adequate short-form measure of loneliness.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/GB6GBXQV/Wu and Yao - 2008 - Psychometric analysis of the short-form UCLA Lonel.pdf}
}

@article{zotero-17671,
  title = {Coeficiente de Empatía},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/4W2UNJHX/Coeficiente de Empatía.pdf}
}

@article{zotero-17801,
  title = {MANUAL PARA LA UTILIZACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO},
  langid = {spanish},
  file = {/home/emrys/Zotero/storage/XCU35EX9/MANUAL PARA LA UTILIZACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO.pdf}
}