You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm a big fan of dbt-metabase! Especially the exposures feature has been a complete game changer to avoid deploying model changes that would break metabase cards.
With a growing number of cards in Metabase, my team figured that it's not only important to understand by which cards our DBT models are referenced , but also whether these cards are still being used. Hence, I was thinking to add the last_used_at and average_query_time fields from the metabase card API to the exposure metadata. They strike me as a good proxy for whether a card is still usable (query time) and whether it gets used (last used timestamp)
I've already done this on a local fork (see screenshot) of the repo and would be happy to contribute it. Wdyt @gouline?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
gouline
changed the title
[Improvement] Additional metadata to understand "usability" of a card
Additional metadata to understand "usability" of a card
Oct 12, 2024
Hi there,
I'm a big fan of
dbt-metabase
! Especially theexposures
feature has been a complete game changer to avoid deploying model changes that would break metabase cards.With a growing number of cards in Metabase, my team figured that it's not only important to understand by which cards our DBT models are referenced , but also whether these cards are still being used. Hence, I was thinking to add the
last_used_at
andaverage_query_time
fields from the metabase card API to the exposure metadata. They strike me as a good proxy for whether a card is still usable (query time) and whether it gets used (last used timestamp)I've already done this on a local fork (see screenshot) of the repo and would be happy to contribute it. Wdyt @gouline?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: