You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In page 907, equation (23) and GPStuff appendix, there is the canonical
periodic covariance function. And it is not obvious to find the explicit
form of quasi-periodic covariance function in section 3.5.
In the demo_periodic.m, there is alway the decay term, i.e. another SE
term, which is very confusing. I suggest add an additional example which
set decay to 0 and not including the extra length scale."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
how about changing the description around (121) in the manual and the help-description in the function to actually match? help gpcf_periodic talks of lengthScale, lengthScale_sexp,"decay" and period. (121) deals in "inverse length of period", and "smoothness in dimension x".
Both descriptions should include the same number of parameters, preferably under the same names. It is not at all clear what the differences between lengthScale and lengthScale_sexp is, especially since (121) can be viewed as a combination of a sine and a sexp
From Lu Cheng:
"It was said in GPStuff manual page 42 that periodic kernel was coming
from this paper
http://jmlr.org/proceedings/papers/v33/solin14.pdf
In page 907, equation (23) and GPStuff appendix, there is the canonical
periodic covariance function. And it is not obvious to find the explicit
form of quasi-periodic covariance function in section 3.5.
In the demo_periodic.m, there is alway the decay term, i.e. another SE
term, which is very confusing. I suggest add an additional example which
set decay to 0 and not including the extra length scale."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: