Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

isLibrary re-implementation #7

Open
Tracked by #2
janpaulpl opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #2

isLibrary re-implementation #7

janpaulpl opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement Priority is very low

Comments

@janpaulpl
Copy link
Member

janpaulpl commented Jun 23, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Throughout the transformer and IR, the isLibrary boolean check for valid libraries is hardcoded/removed. This is because gvc0 checks for local libraries and doesn't really make use of downloaded ones. We basically only care about pyTEAL for the basic examples, but we'll definitely have to re-integrate the checks for local libraries to support a module system!
@janpaulpl janpaulpl mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2023
Closed
4 tasks
@janpaulpl janpaulpl changed the title Throughout the transformer and IR, the isLibrary boolean check for valid libraries is hardcoded/removed. This is because gvc0 checks for local libraries and doesn't really make use of downloaded ones. We basically only care about pyTEAL for the basic examples, but we'll definitely have to re-integrate the checks for local libraries to support a module system! isLibrary re-implementation Jun 23, 2023
@janpaulpl janpaulpl added the enhancement Priority is very low label Jun 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Priority is very low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@janpaulpl