Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(operator): Set object storage for delete requests when using retention #13562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

xperimental
Copy link
Collaborator

What this PR does / why we need it:

Loki 3.1 requires a new option in the compactor configuration when retention is enabled. If the option is missing, the configuration will fail validation and Loki does not start. This affects all components, not just the compactor.

This PR adds the new configuration option when retention is enabled.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes LOG-5821

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

  • Reviewed the CONTRIBUTING.md guide (required)
  • Tests updated
  • Title matches the required conventional commits format, see here

@xperimental xperimental self-assigned this Jul 17, 2024
@xperimental xperimental requested review from periklis and a team as code owners July 17, 2024 17:37
@periklis periklis merged commit 46de4c1 into grafana:main Jul 17, 2024
70 checks passed
periklis pushed a commit to periklis/loki that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
periklis pushed a commit to periklis/loki that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
periklis pushed a commit to periklis/loki that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
periklis added a commit to openshift/loki that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
periklis added a commit to openshift/loki that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
periklis added a commit to openshift/loki that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
@xperimental xperimental deleted the fix-retention-compactor branch July 18, 2024 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants