-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve log deduplication by having a log parser do automatically discovery of log patterns #807
Comments
Interesting feature indeed, However I'm not sure if we should implement this directly in Loki or within Grafana Explore. WDYT @davkal ? |
That's a really good point, if you implement it within Grafana then everyone wins (Loki, Elastic Search, and potentially other data sources) / could benefit from the feature vs it being Loki specific. |
related #28 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the past 30 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Datadogs' blog looks so great. Can we reconsider the possibility of the feature? I’m thinking a few ways this might work:
(We are storing logs in Loki, so I guess Loki plugins might share more insights about the data and might be more performant.) If neither #1 nor #2 is available in the near future, then is it possible to done it in the form of the Grafana plugin? Does Grafana have extension points might be helpful? |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
datadogs was too expensive for me, but I loved it's log-pattern feature. https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/log-patterns/
(Basically, if I have 1000 logs in a timespan it'll tell me I have ~30 unique patterns and frequency count of how often a pattern appears)
Describe the solution you'd like
https://github.com/logpai/logparser
describes log parsers that can do pattern recognition.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Log deduplication is a step in the right direction, maybe it could be improved further without having to incorporate log pattern recognition.
Additional context
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42470403/62014022-9621f100-b169-11e9-9c86-ee4e9dc47d0a.png)
(I added a screenshot snippit from their webpage incase they change the webpage)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: