Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 16, 2021. It is now read-only.

Deprecate/remove changing configuration #105

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 11, 2017

Conversation

StefMa
Copy link
Contributor

@StefMa StefMa commented Jul 10, 2017

This will declare DelegatedTiActivity#isActivityChangingConfigurations as deprecated. We don't need that call anymore. Our internal API have removed the call to it.
Public API's are set to deprecated with a hint what to use now.

With that change I also removed the generic from the DelegatedTiActivtiy. It's not needed...

@StefMa StefMa changed the title Cleanup/remove changing configuration Deprecate/remove changing configuration Jul 10, 2017
@passsy
Copy link
Contributor

passsy commented Jul 10, 2017

Don't deprecate it, remove it completely. It's part of the internal package, we can change it at any time. I don't think somebody was using the public methods in TiActivity

@StefMa StefMa force-pushed the cleanup/remove_changing_conf branch from eb179f7 to a5ac1c9 Compare July 10, 2017 14:55
@@ -139,9 +138,6 @@ public void activityChangingConfiguration_retainTrue_backstackFalse_dkATrue() {
assertThat(fragment.getPresenter().isDestroyed()).isTrue();
assertThat(mSavior.getPresenterCount()).isEqualTo(0);

// When the Activity is changing its configuration.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this comment should stay although the activity parameters don't change

@StefMa StefMa force-pushed the cleanup/remove_changing_conf branch 2 times, most recently from 204091f to 109e5eb Compare July 11, 2017 09:26
@StefMa StefMa force-pushed the cleanup/remove_changing_conf branch from 109e5eb to a7052f2 Compare July 11, 2017 09:27
@passsy passsy merged commit 2167ac8 into GCX-HCI:master Jul 11, 2017
@passsy passsy mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants