You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here, series 3 is 301 out of 600, so it should be represented by roughly 50% (50) of squares.
However, we can see that it is represented by 48 squares.
Another example, with this configuration, both final series have the same value (4) but are represented with a different number of squares (5 and 1)
My expectation is that series with the same value should be represented with the same number of squares, corresponding to their relative percentage to the total value. There might be 1-square differences due to rounding, but here in both examples it appears to be a larger error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using the Waffle Graph, the proportions of each serie's representation is wrong.
This inconsistency is directly visible in the provided example:
Here, series 3 is 301 out of 600, so it should be represented by roughly 50% (50) of squares.
However, we can see that it is represented by 48 squares.
Another example, with this configuration, both final series have the same value (4) but are represented with a different number of squares (5 and 1)
My expectation is that series with the same value should be represented with the same number of squares, corresponding to their relative percentage to the total value. There might be 1-square differences due to rounding, but here in both examples it appears to be a larger error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: