Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please release a version to PyPI #31

Open
hggh opened this issue May 25, 2015 · 9 comments
Open

Please release a version to PyPI #31

hggh opened this issue May 25, 2015 · 9 comments
Labels

Comments

@hggh
Copy link

hggh commented May 25, 2015

would be nice if we can release a version to pypi.

@SEJeff
Copy link
Member

SEJeff commented May 26, 2015

Give us a week or so to look through the existing backlog of tickets and merge any outstanding PRs, but this should be doable soonish.

@hggh
Copy link
Author

hggh commented May 26, 2015

👍

@mleinart
Copy link
Member

I dont see a problem uploading a version of some kind, but I'll note that graphite components have always been released lockstep with everything on the same version. Given that the master branch of carbon still doesnt have ceres support merged in, that isn't possible in this case.

Perhaps we just name this 0.10.dev1 or 0.10.a1 - that looks to be what PEP-0440 wants.

@krak3n
Copy link

krak3n commented Oct 20, 2015

Didn't get round to it then 😛

@deniszh
Copy link
Member

deniszh commented Mar 19, 2017

I'm wondering if ceres compatible with master carbon... Maybe somebody knows. @iain-buclaw-sociomantic ?

@deniszh
Copy link
Member

deniszh commented Mar 20, 2017

I created issue #45 for discussing Ceres future.

@iain-buclaw-sociomantic
Copy link
Contributor

Ceres is not only compatible with master carbon, it runs using half the CPU!

I think megacarbon should be considered dead, as the various PRs I raised last year pretty much hammered the final nail in its coffin - graphite-project/carbon#484, graphite-project/carbon#508, and graphite-project/carbon#596.

@deniszh
Copy link
Member

deniszh commented Mar 20, 2017

That's great, @iain-buclaw-sociomantic !
Then we still have a chance to include it to Graphite properly. :)

@iain-buclaw-sociomantic
Copy link
Contributor

Yep. Although I use graphite-api here, the last test I did using graphite-web appeared to be successful with a cursory test (graphite-project/graphite-web#1719 (comment)). I think there are some known problems with brace matching in the ceres reader however, I'm not sure though, so don't hold me to that. :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants