Welcome to the Graph Protocol! Thanks a ton for your interest in contributing.
If you run into any problems feel free to create an issue. PRs are much appreciated for simple things. Here's a list of good first issues. If it's something more complex we'd appreciate having a quick chat in GitHub Issues or Discord.
Join the conversation on our Discord.
Please follow the Code of Conduct for all the communications and at events. Thank you!
Install development helpers:
cargo install cargo-watch
rustup component add rustfmt
Set environment variables:
# Only required when testing the Diesel/Postgres store
export THEGRAPH_STORE_POSTGRES_DIESEL_URL=<Postgres database URL>
- Note You can follow Docker Compose instructions in store/test-store/README.md to easily run a Postgres instance and use
postgresql://graph:graph@127.0.0.1:5432/graph-test
as the Postgres database URL value.
While developing, a useful command to run in the background is this:
cargo watch \
-x "fmt --all" \
-x check \
-x "test -- --test-threads=1" \
-x "doc --no-deps"
This will watch your source directory and continuously do the following on changes:
- Build all packages in the workspace
target/
. - Generate docs for all packages in the workspace in
target/doc/
. - Automatically format all your source files.
The tests can (and should) be run against a sharded store. See store/test-store/README.md for detailed instructions about how to run the sharded integrations tests.
We use the following format for commit messages:
{crate-name}: {Brief description of changes}
, for example: store: Support 'Or' filters
.
If multiple crates are being changed list them all like this: core, graphql: Add event source to store
If all (or most) crates are affected
by the commit, start the message with all:
.
The body of the message can be terse, with just enough information to explain what the commit does overall. In a lot of cases, more extensive explanations of how the commit achieves its goal are better as comments in the code.
Commits in a pull request should be structured in such a way that each
commit consists of a small logical step towards the overall goal of the
pull request. Your pull request should make it as easy as possible for the
reviewer to follow each change you are making. For example, it is a good
idea to separate simple mechanical changes like renaming a method that
touches many files from logic changes. Your pull request should not be
structured into commits according to how you implemented your feature,
often indicated by commit messages like 'Fix problem' or 'Cleanup'. Flex a
bit, and make the world think that you implemented your feature perfectly,
in small logical steps, in one sitting without ever having to touch up
something you did earlier in the pull request. (In reality, that means
you'll use git rebase -i
a lot)
Please do not merge master into your branch as you develop your pull request; instead, rebase your branch on top of the latest master if your pull request branch is long-lived.
We try to keep the history of the master
branch linear, and avoid merge
commits. Once your pull request is approved, merge it following these
steps:
git checkout master
git pull master
git rebase master my/branch
git push -f
git checkout master
git merge my/branch
git push
Allegedly, clicking on the Rebase and merge
button in the Github UI has
the same effect.