-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 823
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Render implied oneways (motorway, motorway_link) #1820
Comments
JOSM and OSRM are now wrong, the definition has changed since the old ticket [1]. Motorway_link has no implied oneway=yes, see Wiki [2]. [1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/8238 |
I see now, thank you for the clarification. Considering their substantial influence on OSM data, I'm very surprised JOSM and OSRM don't reflect a change that has apparently been on the wiki since 2013. I'll see if issues need to be opened for those respective projects. In the future I hope these kinds of changes will be widely publicized to encourage adoption of standards and keep data quality high. |
Yes, JOSM does imply/render oneway=yes on motorway_link. But its validator does report about missing oneway, but only at the "info" severity level. I think there were changes to this recently so if something is wrong please open a ticket while the issue is hot ;) |
Yes, the issue is a bit more complex after some more digging. But this is not the place for discussing it. |
There are many exits and on-ramps that are only routable oneway that should be tagged with oneway=no or mapped differently. Changing the rendering to facilitate routing improvements seems like a no-brainer.
Duplicate of #1363
JOSM does this
The current rendering makes it seem like there is no issue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31769887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31769819
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: