Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Render implied oneways (motorway, motorway_link) #1820

Closed
ghost opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Render implied oneways (motorway, motorway_link) #1820

ghost opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 9, 2015

There are many exits and on-ramps that are only routable oneway that should be tagged with oneway=no or mapped differently. Changing the rendering to facilitate routing improvements seems like a no-brainer.

Duplicate of #1363

JOSM does this
oneway

The current rendering makes it seem like there is no issue.
twoway

norouting

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31769887
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31769819

@jojo4u
Copy link

jojo4u commented Sep 9, 2015

JOSM and OSRM are now wrong, the definition has changed since the old ticket [1]. Motorway_link has no implied oneway=yes, see Wiki [2].
In your example: Oneway=no should be tagged to make it clear, turn restrictions are missing (already added by me).

[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/8238
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 9, 2015

I see now, thank you for the clarification. Considering their substantial influence on OSM data, I'm very surprised JOSM and OSRM don't reflect a change that has apparently been on the wiki since 2013. I'll see if issues need to be opened for those respective projects. In the future I hope these kinds of changes will be widely publicized to encourage adoption of standards and keep data quality high.

@aceman444
Copy link

Yes, JOSM does imply/render oneway=yes on motorway_link. But its validator does report about missing oneway, but only at the "info" severity level. I think there were changes to this recently so if something is wrong please open a ticket while the issue is hot ;)

@jojo4u
Copy link

jojo4u commented Sep 9, 2015

Yes, the issue is a bit more complex after some more digging. But this is not the place for discussing it.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants