Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Support for other ORMs #26

Closed
fbjork opened this issue May 13, 2011 · 235 comments
Closed

Add Support for other ORMs #26

fbjork opened this issue May 13, 2011 · 235 comments

Comments

@fbjork
Copy link

fbjork commented May 13, 2011

First of all great job on active_admin! Impressive and really easy to get up and running.

Any plans to support other ORMs like Mongoid?

@gregbell
Copy link
Contributor

Yes this is definitely something on our Roadmap. So we've got a few requests for Mongoid. Any other specific ORMs for "official" support?

@jc00ke
Copy link

jc00ke commented May 13, 2011

First, thanks for the gem @gregbell!

+1 for Mongoid so I can use active_admin on my current project.

@pusewicz
Copy link

How about using something more abstract for db support?

@gregbell
Copy link
Contributor

Yes agreed. We'll have to abstract the concept of data stores and data access. I'm just trying to get a sense for which ORMs people are interested in "Out of the Box".

@jc00ke
Copy link

jc00ke commented May 13, 2011

Maybe ianwhite/orm_adapter could help in this? I believe it's what devise
uses under the hood.

@kpsteig
Copy link

kpsteig commented May 13, 2011

+1 for Mongoid. That'd be a big help for me.

@gregbell
Copy link
Contributor

@jc00ke Thanks for the suggestion. This seems like a great starting point.

@luma
Copy link

luma commented May 14, 2011

Datamapper support would be awesome too.

@pusewicz
Copy link

Redis and Riak for me

Sent from my iPad

On 13 May 2011, at 22:38, gregbellreply@reply.github.com wrote:

Yes agreed. We'll have to abstract the concept of data stores and data access. I'm just trying to get a sense for which ORMs people are interested in "Out of the Box".

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#26 (comment)

@PabloC
Copy link

PabloC commented May 14, 2011

+1 for mongoid support

@apardo
Copy link

apardo commented May 15, 2011

+1 for Mongoid support

@rurounijones
Copy link

I think (and I might be open to flame-bait here) that the most widely used NoSQL database for primary datastore for apps is mongodb. As for the ODM my impression is that Mongoid seems to be the more popular one. Therefore I would say that Mongoid would be head on the NoSQL list.

Maybe github needs polls ;)

@phosphene
Copy link

+1 for mongoid!

@drewda
Copy link

drewda commented May 16, 2011

Over in RailsAdmin land, they're considering using either OrmAdapter or Veneer in order to support a wider range of options.

@jmcopeland
Copy link

+1 for Mongoid

@cblavier
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@jacobwgillespie
Copy link

+1 for Mongoid

@lapluviosilla
Copy link

Yes, this would be so awesome. +1

@brainopia
Copy link

If you want a poll, then I'd definitely vote for mongoid :)

@juniovitorino
Copy link

+1 for mongoid.

@jeremyruppel
Copy link
Contributor

Second @drewda's OrmAdapter suggestion, especially since it's already a dependency of devise.

@kmamykin
Copy link

+1 for mongoid

1 similar comment
@stratequip
Copy link

+1 for mongoid

@nevir
Copy link
Contributor

nevir commented May 26, 2011

Also interested in this (for DataMapper).

From a quick look into taking a stab at it, ORM adapter probably needs to be extended to be aware of more data (types of columns, being able to enumerate assocations on a model). Also, InheritedResource is pretty coupled to ActiveRecord and its finders would probably need to be overridden (and/or ORM adapter also needs to abstract out the ability to query on collections).

Veneer is probably a better starting point, currently, since it has support for introspecting the associations on a model. https://github.com/kaapa/veneer/commits/properties

@damrbaby
Copy link
Contributor

+1 mongoid!

@rbq
Copy link

rbq commented May 26, 2011

+1 for DataMapper

@oleksify
Copy link

+1 mongoid

1 similar comment
@aubergene
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

Why not just do it via ActiveModel?

@docwhat
Copy link

docwhat commented Jun 1, 2011

+1 ActiveModel

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

Speaking of time, if anyone wants their ORM of choice supported and is willing to spend some time pair programming with me, let me know!

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

anyone ⁉️

@elia
Copy link
Member

elia commented Aug 21, 2013

@daxter I'd love to do that, especially porting stuff from activeadmin-mongoid, but sadly have no time these days

@spockz
Copy link

spockz commented Aug 21, 2013

I would've liked to join you, however, I'm currently not on a Ruby/Rails project and my time is needed elsewhere. So, sadly, I cannot help.

@rottmanj
Copy link

@daxter

I have a large amount of free time and I have a few other people who would be willing to help with getting ActiveResource working with AA

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

@elia & @spockz, no worries :)

@rottmanj, great! Except, what do you mean by ActiveResource? It's our reliance on ActiveRecord that's the problem.

@rottmanj
Copy link

@daxter

I am referring g to adding activeresource support within active admin.

There was a request for this in #39

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

I still don't know what you mean by that. Could you elaborate?

@rottmanj
Copy link

@daxter

Right now you can not use a model that inherits from active resource as a resource with in active admin.

@redrick
Copy link

redrick commented Oct 7, 2013

How are you guys ( @rottmanj ) on the ActiveResource with AA? It would suit my needs perfectly :) +1

@tsyber1an
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

+1's on this only help to make myself and other maintainers more stressed about this topic. Please either help or donate.

@candreoliveira
Copy link

+1 mongoid.... fast fast

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

@candreoliveira did you not see my comment above? You can help by donating time or money.

@usmanarif
Copy link

+1 for Riak with Ripple. As I didn't get any working Activeadmin in Riak based application.

@tzmgit
Copy link

tzmgit commented Feb 11, 2014

+1 mongoid

6 similar comments
@mayatskiy
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@Seaborg
Copy link

Seaborg commented Jun 17, 2014

+1 mongoid

@sanalpencere
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@dsylla
Copy link

dsylla commented Sep 5, 2014

+1 mongoid

@dmitrypol
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@flaviomori
Copy link

+1 mongoid

@juni0r
Copy link

juni0r commented Oct 6, 2014

+1 for Mongoid

elia referenced this issue in activeadmin/activeadmin-mongoid Oct 6, 2014
@mmenafra
Copy link

+1 mongo id
+1 redis

gogogogo

@vekozlov
Copy link

vekozlov commented Jun 1, 2015

+1 mongo id

@seanlinsley
Copy link
Contributor

Go to #2714 to test Mongoid integration instead of 👍ing this ticket.

@activeadmin activeadmin locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 13, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests