-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CLOSED] collect info: why did we fork twice today ? #105
Comments
Comment by Mercosity Erkan, I didn't restart either of my win full nodes and they are on Block 861993 - Hash: 583b4 ... 9b90. The question is which chain am I on? I must admit to be totally confused. |
Comment by Erkan-Yilmaz You are on the A2 chain when you have following hashes: getblockhash 861993 getblockhash 861971 |
Comment by Mercosity Ok, checked both hashes and they tally with the hashes for what you are calling the A2 chain. I suppose I'll stick here for now and support this chain as I haven't restarted either node. |
Comment by TG13088 Did see two anomalies in my log which may shed some clues They are as follows: Signing Block for cpid 7ace61f1014802fe81b54a3010a9df33 and blockhash 96894542a4e640e9663239e3d8202ff577b0aa9d7aba48f545b4a8fcb11eb62d with sig MEUCIQDLDGPkt2+JAXb6di6J82sqkHHtAZMyPccX8H/vqsXHVwIgTlqQSJK9TgJHRh3zowtyFq62h1MSlIu0tE853boyLvo= 04/04/17 18:13:52 * Received block 867763db7df0dbf366e3571366160263e8ea4193951e8f1a2611c29555ffceb7; - Signing Block for cpid 7ace61f1014802fe81b54a3010a9df33 and blockhash 96894542a4e640e9663239e3d8202ff577b0aa9d7aba48f545b4a8fcb11eb62d with sig MEQCIGIgFapnOH62f2UVIbcV/le7HX+kq+MgXmDHJWh3WJupAiBiHrSH3foXshQ/8Kzjtt2CyzfNYi++53m9po4isOX+bQ== 04/04/17 18:13:53 ERROR: ConnectBlock[] : Superblock hash does not match consensus hash; SuperblockHash: aa3920a997aa31f9dd0175711b7f241b, Consensus Hash: .. to be continued |
Comment by TG13088 Anomaly #2 ReorganizePostponing 0 reconnects Reorganizing Attempt #2.000000, regression to block #862012.000000 04/04/17 18:15:06 Postponing 1 reconnects Reorganizing Attempt #3.000000, regression to block #862012.000000 04/04/17 18:15:06 Postponing 1 reconnects Reorganizing Attempt #4.000000, regression to block #862012.000000 04/04/17 18:15:06 Postponing 1 reconnects Reorganizing Attempt #5.000000, regression to block #862012.000000 04/04/17 18:15:06 Postponing 1 reconnects |
Comment by xXUnRealXx As to: I've moved my wallet over to one of my slow pc's as the wallet tends to eat up 1 of 4 cores when loading and than staking. I've found it works better on the slow pc and it doesn't eat up as much CPU. |
Comment by denravonska
|
Issue by Erkan-Yilmaz
Tuesday Apr 04, 2017 at 17:50 GMT
Originally opened as Erkan-Yilmaz/Gridcoin-tasks#100
This task is about collecting infos, so it gets added into the bugtracker here!
In both cases what helped to get on the chain with the higher net weight was:
questions to be answered:
Keep in mind, before we had the problems starting (March 20) our net weight levels were like 70-90 million in average, when many were staking like120-150 mio.
Gridcoin version 3.5.8.8
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: