-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Huge difference to regular darknet output #12
Comments
I've been having the same issue too. I've seen a notable loss in accuracy with the conversion from darknet to keras and this may have been propagated onto the edge tpu model. |
I am experiencing the same kind of issue (worse output after conversion). I don't know if it's the inference.py script or the converted model. I've also noticed that the boxes sometimes have negative coordinates. |
I have the same problem, any solution? |
Hi @ItsMeTheBee @Rariusz Plus, please confirm that 「anchor.txt」 is loaded properly. (I think your bounding boxes are too small) |
Maybe it has something to do with the missing representative dataset for int8 calibration? This repo for some reason just generates random data. Unfortunately, I couldn't get this repository to work yet, so I can't confirm if this is a fix. |
Hey there!
After compiling my custom tiny yolo v3 network for the edgetpu I´m able to run my network but the output is insanely different.
On my custom network there is only one class, anchors and input size remain the same so i don´t know where these issues might be coming from.
Edge Tpu output:
Desired output
Do you have any why this is happening and how to fix this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: