You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lots of openings are gambits (e.g. Queen's Gambit, King's Gambit, Evans Gambit, Latvian Gambit). How come? Does giving up a pawn in the beginning of the game in exchange for a tempo or faster development actually help that much?
Being able to identify games that have gambits like that would help us analyze chess games and identify what gambits may or may not be playable. This might be as simple as looking for specific openings/ECO codes, or more involved like looking at evals and material balances in the beginning of the game.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Lots of openings are gambits (e.g. Queen's Gambit, King's Gambit, Evans Gambit, Latvian Gambit). How come? Does giving up a pawn in the beginning of the game in exchange for a tempo or faster development actually help that much?
Being able to identify games that have gambits like that would help us analyze chess games and identify what gambits may or may not be playable. This might be as simple as looking for specific openings/ECO codes, or more involved like looking at evals and material balances in the beginning of the game.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: