Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v1+ (and if possible for older versions too, mainly 0.4+) LB_CULL vs. LB #51

Open
jowens opened this issue May 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@jowens
Copy link
Contributor

jowens commented May 8, 2020

LB_CULL vs. LB
Impact of kernel fusion, maybe normalized over LB.

@jowens
Copy link
Contributor Author

jowens commented Jun 6, 2020

@neoblizz : consider the graphs per primitive labeled "advance mode", e.g.:

https://gunrock.github.io/docs/#/analysis/results_bfs?id=vis_gunrock_primitives_dobfs_advance_mode
(the run called "runs per advance mode, measured on V100")

In this I made a few decisions:

  • V100 only
  • Separate out different primitive-specific options into different rows (here, idempotence/mark-pred/undirected)
  • Plot MTEPS not normalized MTEPS

Obviously easier for me to leave what I made, but I want you to have something you find useful, so speak up if you want something different.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants