You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, if a property that is in the model doesn't exist in the returned results set, it returns nothing, regardless of if a default is provided or not. It seems rational to not return a value in the model that doesn't exist, which allows someone to understand what is coming from the API or not. But I think there are benefits to allowing someone to set default on a property and allow the model to return that in the situation that the value wasn't set in the original response. By checking whether a default is set in general, regardless of if it is truthy, falsey, or whatever else, this supports backwards compatibility with the option to 'opt in' to setting a default for a property.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, if a property that is in the model doesn't exist in the returned results set, it returns nothing, regardless of if a default is provided or not. It seems rational to not return a value in the model that doesn't exist, which allows someone to understand what is coming from the API or not. But I think there are benefits to allowing someone to set default on a property and allow the model to return that in the situation that the value wasn't set in the original response. By checking whether a default is set in general, regardless of if it is truthy, falsey, or whatever else, this supports backwards compatibility with the option to 'opt in' to setting a default for a property.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: