Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does MegaFusion work on 4096 x 4096? #3

Open
arthur-qiu opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Does MegaFusion work on 4096 x 4096? #3

arthur-qiu opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@arthur-qiu
Copy link

Thanks for your interesting method which works for many base models. Does MegaFusion work on 4096 x 4096 (based on SDXL)? Directly changing the output resolution will lead to terrible results.

@arthur-qiu
Copy link
Author

arthur-qiu commented Jan 24, 2025

Image

stage_resolutions: [1024, 2048, 4096]
stage_steps: [40, 5, 5]

@arthur-qiu
Copy link
Author

Image

It will be better if I choose the dilation and reschedule options. But there are still some artifacts.

@haoningwu3639
Copy link
Owner

Theoretically, MegaFusion is capable of generating at a 4096 resolution.
However, due to memory limitations, we have not conducted extensive experiments at such high resolutions.
We recommend adjusting the noise rescheduler accordingly to achieve optimal performance.”

@arthur-qiu
Copy link
Author

Theoretically, MegaFusion is capable of generating at a 4096 resolution. However, due to memory limitations, we have not conducted extensive experiments at such high resolutions. We recommend adjusting the noise rescheduler accordingly to achieve optimal performance.”

Adding vae.enable_tiling() can make your model work on Single A100. Since most previous works support 4096 on SDXL, it will be less competitive If Megafusion cannot succeed on 4096.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants