-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DKIM with same key but using different domains #5
Comments
Just lack of need from the person/people who wrote the plugin. Can you define how you envision the config looking for such a setup? |
I second this request. We allow sending over our Haraka from many domains. We tell our customers to use a cname dns entry for our dkim record. Would be great if Haraka would allow that, too. |
https://github.com/haraka/Haraka/blob/7632d69d73f42c8b616ee2d4337230e58e13416e/docs/plugins/dkim_sign.md |
I'm with logvik here. I think this is possible with the current version? I don't see why this wouldn't work? The dkim generated by the tool is not domain specific: https://github.com/haraka/Haraka/blob/master/config/dkim/dkim_key_gen.sh#L36 so you can simply duplicate the directory to another domain. |
Even better than duplicating is symlinks (not tested, YMMV) |
I just completed a plugin that does this exact thing, based on @msimerson recommendation: https://github.com/niiknow/dockers/blob/master/haraka/rootfs/sysprepz/plugins/dkim_bouncer.js#L41
|
Migrated to wiki. Status QuoCurrently this feature can be achieved by creating a DKIM key In The Usual Way for Suggested ChangeCreate a specially named DKIM signing key, such as |
In our infrastructure we allow to sign from multiple domains but using the same keys.
Base in the question I can understand that is secure.
http://serverfault.com/questions/785151/dkim-with-same-key-but-different-domains
You currently allow:
We found very difficult to mantain a new key for every domain. So we ended using the same key but using different domains.
Why dont allow that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: