Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Odroid XU4 license of bl1/bl2 #49

Open
jspricke opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Odroid XU4 license of bl1/bl2 #49

jspricke opened this issue Apr 24, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@jspricke
Copy link

Can you add some license statement to the XU4 fuse directory? Especially about if it's allowed to redistribute them. Please add it as a LICENSE file in the sd_fuse directory.
If the license permits, I will create a Debian package of it for the non-free section. This would allow us to install Debian out of the box without modifications.

Thanks!

Jochen

@jriwanek
Copy link

According to: https://github.com/hardkernel/u-boot_firmware/blob/odroidxu4-firmware2/LICENSE

The firmware blobs are GPL 3, I've requested the source code as they've marked them as such.

@laf0rge
Copy link
Contributor

laf0rge commented Feb 17, 2019

Any update here? Did anyone receive the source code to those?

@jspricke
Copy link
Author

@laf0rge There is kind of an answer here: hardkernel/u-boot_firmware#1

Would still be great to have some license clarificationhere.

@tobetter
Copy link
Collaborator

I am not really sure how the mixed license can be managed can be together yet. When the guys pushed the blobs to the git is to support non-expert and I guess that's not the best way anyway. Regardless of where and how the files are shared, the license should be clarified. U-boot source code is already shared through Github, other binaries - bl1.bin and tzsw.bin - are the proprietary of Samsung, Even I've looked up the Samsung opensource site how they manage the license for such blobs, unfortunately, no luck. Since they are not Hardkernel's proprietary, not able to set the commercial license as Hardkernel wishes.

I would happily accept the suggestion.
Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants