Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: reduce number of account used e2e init account test #477

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

JeffreyDallas
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request changes the following:

  • Reduce number of account used e2e init account test

Related Issues

Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Tang <jeffrey@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Tang <jeffrey@swirldslabs.com>
@JeffreyDallas JeffreyDallas requested review from leninmehedy and a team as code owners August 9, 2024 22:17
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Unit Test Results - Linux

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   1m 31s ⏱️ -32s
124 tests ±0  124 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
150 runs  ±0  150 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 586998f. ± Comparison against base commit 0ac484d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Unit Test Results - Windows

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   1m 40s ⏱️ +13s
124 tests ±0  124 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
150 runs  ±0  150 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 586998f. ± Comparison against base commit 0ac484d.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

E2E Node PFX Kill Add Tests Coverage Report

 1 files   1 suites   9m 30s ⏱️
18 tests 18 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
20 runs  20 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 586998f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

E2E Tests Coverage Report

55 tests   55 ✅  4m 59s ⏱️
 9 suites   0 💤
 1 files     0 ❌

Results for commit 586998f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

E2E Node PEM Stop Add Tests Coverage Report

 1 files   1 suites   7m 18s ⏱️
18 tests 18 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
20 runs  20 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 586998f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

E2E Node Local Build Tests Coverage Report

8 tests   8 ✅  5m 6s ⏱️
2 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 586998f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

E2E Mirror Node Tests Coverage Report

11 tests   11 ✅  3m 37s ⏱️
 1 suites   0 💤
 1 files     0 ❌

Results for commit 586998f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

E2E Relay Tests Coverage Report

1 files  1 suites   2m 37s ⏱️
5 tests 5 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
6 runs  6 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 586998f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Tang <jeffrey@swirldslabs.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Tang <jeffrey@swirldslabs.com>
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Aug 10, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 0ac484d1 100.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (0ac484d) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (586998f) 3501 2842 81.18%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#477) 1 1 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

…reduce-init-account

Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Tang <jeffrey@swirldslabs.com>

# Conflicts:
#	src/core/constants.mjs
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.87%. Comparing base (67f47c1) to head (586998f).
Report is 49 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #477      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.44%   81.87%   +0.43%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        4095     4182      +87     
  Branches      719      725       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         3335     3424      +89     
+ Misses        760      758       -2     
Files Coverage Δ
src/core/constants.mjs 94.04% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon merged commit 51d7ade into main Aug 12, 2024
33 checks passed
@jeromy-cannon jeromy-cannon deleted the 00476-D-reduce-init-account branch August 12, 2024 10:29
swirlds-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
## [0.28.0](v0.27.0...v0.28.0) (2024-08-26)

### Features

* add freeze account ([#436](#436)) ([8fe5a41](8fe5a41))
* enhance node add to work with staking and dynamic address book ([#469](#469)) ([b452599](b452599))
* use k8s configMaps to mount files during solo network deploy  ([#345](#345)) ([af27f16](af27f16))

### Bug Fixes

* hugo jsdoc failure ([#498](#498)) ([ff07413](ff07413))
* reduce number of account used e2e init account test ([#477](#477)) ([51d7ade](51d7ade))
* Resolve various problems to enable tests from local-node and smart-contracts to run agains solo network ([#402](#402)) ([c99d881](c99d881))
* use path.join instead of forward slashes to support Windows ([#491](#491)) ([82a5053](82a5053))
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.28.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reduce number of account used in init account testing
3 participants