Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

windows: remove LazyDLL calls for system modules #19925

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

windows: remove LazyDLL calls for system modules #19925

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

tgross
Copy link
Member

@tgross tgross commented Feb 8, 2024

On Windows, Nomad uses syscall.NewLazyDLL and syscall.LoadDLL functions to load a few system DLL files, which does not prevent DLL hijacking attacks. Hypothetically a local attacker on the client host that can place an abusive library in a specific location could use this to escalate privileges to the Nomad process. Although this attack does not fall within the Nomad security model, it doesn't hurt to follow good practices here.

We can remove two of these DLL loads by using wrapper functions provided by the stdlib in x/sys/windows

Fixes: https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad-enterprise/issues/991

On Windows, Nomad uses `syscall.NewLazyDLL` and `syscall.LoadDLL` functions to
load a few system DLL files, which does not prevent DLL hijacking
attacks. Hypothetically a local attacker on the client host that can place an
abusive library in a specific location could use this to escalate privileges to
the Nomad process. Although this attack does not fall within the Nomad security
model, it doesn't hurt to follow good practices here.

We can remove two of these DLL loads by using wrapper functions provided by the
stdlib in `x/sys/windows`
@tgross
Copy link
Member Author

tgross commented Feb 8, 2024

I did a smoke test of the executor and that LGTM. Also did a quick smoke test of the makeDf change, which shows what I'd expect in the fingerprint:

node-status-self

Copy link
Member

@schmichael schmichael left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not a blocker

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/1.5.x backport to 1.5.x release line backport/1.6.x backport to 1.6.x release line backport/1.7.x backport to 1.7.x release line theme/platform-windows theme/security type/enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants