-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add validation to the name of aws_elb resource. #10693
Conversation
I rebased. Tests are still OK. $ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestValidateElbName'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestValidateElbName -timeout 120m
=== RUN TestValidateElbName
--- PASS: TestValidateElbName (0.00s)
=== RUN TestValidateElbNamePrefix
--- PASS: TestValidateElbNamePrefix (0.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws 1.659s |
Pull request #21306 has significantly refactored the AWS Provider codebase. As a result, most PRs opened prior to the refactor now have merge conflicts that must be resolved before proceeding. Specifically, PR #21306 relocated the code for all AWS resources and data sources from a single We recognize that many pull requests have been open for some time without yet being addressed by our maintainers. Therefore, we want to make it clear that resolving these conflicts in no way affects the prioritization of a particular pull request. Once a pull request has been prioritized for review, the necessary changes will be made by a maintainer -- either directly or in collaboration with the pull request author. For a more complete description of this refactor, including examples of how old filepaths and function names correspond to their new counterparts: please refer to issue #20000. For a quick guide on how to amend your pull request to resolve the merge conflicts resulting from this refactor and bring it in line with our new code patterns: please refer to our Service Package Refactor Pull Request Guide. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for this enhancement @kangaechu , LGTM 🚀 I've additionally extended the validation to the name_prefix
argument as it should prevent the internal-
prefix from use in name generation.
Output of unit tests:
--- PASS: TestValidName (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestValidNamePrefix (0.00s)
This functionality has been released in v3.67.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you! |
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. |
The
name
property of theaws_lb
resource cannot begin withinternal-
.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/en_us/cli/latest/reference/elbv2/create-load-balancer.html
So, I added validation to the
name
property to make it aware of Terraform validation.I don't add validation into
name_prefix
because it is already validated to less than 6 characters.https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/blob/dc731c277b97319ed014745222dd260e36fdb42a/aws/validators.go#L453-L456
Community Note
Release note for CHANGELOG:
Output from acceptance testing: