aws china no ipv6,how to disable with security group in terraform

[hashibot]

This issue was originally opened by @henryzhang1984 as hashicorp/terraform#15514. It was migrated here as a result of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.

---

No IPv6 in AWS China Region.

provider "aws" {
region = "cn-north-1"
}

Terraform Version

Terraform v0.9.11

Terraform Configuration Files

ingress {
from_port = 80
to_port = 80
protocol = "tcp"
}

### Debug Output


 aws_security_group.allow_http: 1 error(s) occurred:

* aws_security_group.allow_http: Error revoking default IPv6 egress rule for Security Group (sg-6ddf6109): InvalidParameterValue: remote-ipv6-range
	status code: 400, request id: 749b6277-326e-4a41-8232-d57ef266d50e
* module.might_trousers.aws_security_group.allow_http: 1 error(s) occurred:

* aws_security_group.allow_http: Error revoking default IPv6 egress rule for Security Group (sg-b7df61d3): InvalidParameterValue: remote-ipv6-range
	status code: 400, request id: 52b842e6-10a9-4596-bdb8-081d31d9d763
* module.crazy_foods.aws_security_group.allow_http: 1 error(s) occurred:

* aws_security_group.allow_http: Error revoking default IPv6 egress rule for Security Group (sg-4edc622a): InvalidParameterValue: remote-ipv6-range
	status code: 400, request id: 7db4d9d3-dd65-406f-bfff-cfedf5aaf33e

[bensonz]

Shouldn't this be an egress problem?
Plus AWS China is blocking all port 80 access. You might want to use some other ports.
And I have the same error as well!
Help!

Mine looks like this:

egress {
    from_port   = 0
    to_port     = 0
    protocol    = "-1"
    cidr_blocks = ["0.0.0.0/0"]
}

[bittopaz]

+1

[t1anchen]

+1

[jacobelzey]

+1

[timonwong]

Have a look at: #880

[missingcharacter]

FYI, #880 was merged

[Ninir]

Going to close this one, thanks for the reminder @missingcharacter :)
And thanks for the work also! 😄

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!