-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide SASL/SCRAM based client-authentication for aws_msk_cluster #15298
Comments
Related (enabling SASL/SCRAM on The SCRAM secret will need to be a new resource. |
Any news so far? |
Hi @dishantkamble et al. 👋 dropping a note here that we've just merged in (PR #15302) sasl/scram authentication support in the
and secrets can be associated with something like:
a more detailed example is available in https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/blob/master/website/docs/r/msk_scram_secret_association.html.markdown |
This has been released in version 3.18.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks! |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Community Note
Description
In addition to
client_authentication
possible viatls
there is no option provided for SASL/SCRAM basedclient_authentication
inaws_msk_cluster
resource. Additionally, there are no/selective resources available for the list of operations possible for kafka (AWS MSK) as mentioned in the reference below.I am specifically looking for
batch-associate-scram-secret
operation to enable SASL/SCRAM based authentication via terraform.New or Affected Resource(s)
Potential Terraform Configuration
Possible option for SASL/SCRAM based authentication can be as follows for the client_authentication Argument Reference
References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: