add support for CAA DNS records to aws_route53_record resource

[hashibot]

This issue was originally opened by @danielnbarbosa as hashicorp/terraform#16054. It was migrated here as a result of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.

---

The new CAA record is supported by AWS Route53 but not considered a valid type by terraform. CAA is used to whitelist which certificate authorities are authorized to issue SSL certificates for your domain. It is quite new and was only added to AWS on August 21, 2017. CAs are expected to start enforcing it in September 2017.

Terraform Version

Terraform v0.10.4

Terraform Configuration Files

resource "aws_route53_record" "pear_caa" {
  zone_id = "${aws_route53_zone.pear.zone_id}"
  name    = "pear.md"
  type    = "CAA"
  ttl     = "300"
  records = ["0 issue \"godaddy.com\""]
}

Expected Behavior

terraform plan should work

Actual Behavior

terraform plan returns error on resource type:

1 error(s) occurred:

* module.global_prod.aws_route53_record.pear_caa: "type" must be one of [SOA, A, TXT, NS, CNAME, MX, NAPTR, PTR, SRV, SPF, AAAA]

Steps to Reproduce

Please list the full steps required to reproduce the issue, for example:

1. terraform plan

• Add issue_template terraform#6017

[bflad]

@danielnbarbosa this support was merged into master a few weeks ago via #1465. However, it has not been "released" yet via version 0.1.5, 0.2.0, or 1.0.0 given the current CHANGELOG. You may wish to participate in #1592 asking for releases of this provider more often if its something you're wanting something sooner rather than later.

[stack72]

@Ninir I believe this can be closed via #1465

[Ninir]

Hi folks,

This request was merged in #1467 and followed in #1465, closing! 😄

(Thanks for the ping @stack72 ! 👍 )

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!