Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Data Source: aws_route53_zones #17457

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

yuonoda
Copy link
Contributor

@yuonoda yuonoda commented Feb 4, 2021

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Closes #17334
Closes #37465

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccDataSourceAwsRoute53Zones'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccDataSourceAwsRoute53Zones -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccDataSourceAwsRoute53Zones_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDataSourceAwsRoute53Zones_basic
=== CONT  TestAccDataSourceAwsRoute53Zones_basic
--- PASS: TestAccDataSourceAwsRoute53Zones_basic (60.97s)
PASS
ok      github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws       62.732s
...

@ghost ghost added size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. service/route53 Issues and PRs that pertain to the route53 service. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. labels Feb 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Feb 4, 2021
@ghost ghost added the documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. label Feb 7, 2021
@ghost ghost added the provider Pertains to the provider itself, rather than any interaction with AWS. label Feb 7, 2021
@ghost ghost added size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Feb 7, 2021
@yuonoda yuonoda changed the title Created a data source aws_route53_zones New Data Source: aws_route53_zones Feb 7, 2021
@yuonoda yuonoda marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2021 07:32
@yuonoda yuonoda requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2021 07:32
@hfeixas
Copy link

hfeixas commented Feb 17, 2021

Hey guys, has anyone had a chance to review this ? Would really like to see this feature implemented.

@yuonoda
Copy link
Contributor Author

yuonoda commented Feb 18, 2021

@hfeixas Thank you for your comment. Because there are so many pull requests, they shouldn't have time to review this request. So give me 👍 reaction to tell reviewers this feature needs to be implemented.

@antonosmond
Copy link

It'd be nice if this took filters e.g. vpc_id.
The AWS CLI has aws route53 list-hosted-zones-by-vpc so it must be possible to get the hosted zones for a given VPC ID and potentially other filters too.

@breathingdust breathingdust added new-data-source Introduces a new data source. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Sep 4, 2021
@zhelding
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21306 has significantly refactored the AWS Provider codebase. As a result, most PRs opened prior to the refactor now have merge conflicts that must be resolved before proceeding.

Specifically, PR #21306 relocated the code for all AWS resources and data sources from a single aws directory to a large number of separate directories in internal/service, each corresponding to a particular AWS service. This separation of code has also allowed for us to simplify the names of underlying functions -- while still avoiding namespace collisions.

We recognize that many pull requests have been open for some time without yet being addressed by our maintainers. Therefore, we want to make it clear that resolving these conflicts in no way affects the prioritization of a particular pull request. Once a pull request has been prioritized for review, the necessary changes will be made by a maintainer -- either directly or in collaboration with the pull request author.

For a more complete description of this refactor, including examples of how old filepaths and function names correspond to their new counterparts: please refer to issue #20000.

For a quick guide on how to amend your pull request to resolve the merge conflicts resulting from this refactor and bring it in line with our new code patterns: please refer to our Service Package Refactor Pull Request Guide.

@freakinhippie
Copy link

I know this is a very old PR, but I would like to see it implemented too.

FWIW, in following with the pattern of other recent pluralized data sources, I don't think an empty result set should raise an error, it should just return an empty list.

@yermulnik
Copy link

I know this is a very old PR, but I would like to see it implemented too.

Bumping this thread to see whether this feature is feasible yet.

@LukasdeBoer
Copy link
Contributor

This one would be very nice for us too.

@dreinhardt89
Copy link

We would like this as well

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pre-service-packages Includes pre-Service Packages aspects. label May 13, 2024
@DJAlPee
Copy link

DJAlPee commented May 17, 2024

I have created a new issue without knowing, that this PR already existed: #37465 (Next time, I should search not only the issues, but PRs, too 😉 )

Unfortunately, this PR won't solve my problem directly, because I need the hosted zone names for my case, too. This can be easily achieved by using the aws_route_zone data source with for_each. Ideally, this shouldn't be neccessary, because the list call to AWS provides already a lot of information, which could be used for the resource.

It'd be nice if this took filters e.g. vpc_id. The AWS CLI has aws route53 list-hosted-zones-by-vpc so it must be possible to get the hosted zones for a given VPC ID and potentially other filters too.

With all information provided, it should be possible to filter the results with terraform functions.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit self-assigned this Aug 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. label Aug 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccRoute53ZonesDataSource_' PKG=route53
make: Verifying source code with gofmt...
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go1.22.6 test ./internal/service/route53/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccRoute53ZonesDataSource_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccRoute53ZonesDataSource_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRoute53ZonesDataSource_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRoute53ZonesDataSource_basic
--- PASS: TestAccRoute53ZonesDataSource_basic (84.74s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/route53	89.773s

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@yuonoda Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit merged commit 23be713 into hashicorp:main Aug 19, 2024
39 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.64.0 milestone Aug 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the prioritized Part of the maintainer teams immediate focus. To be addressed within the current quarter. label Aug 20, 2024
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.63.1 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. new-data-source Introduces a new data source. pre-service-packages Includes pre-Service Packages aspects. provider Pertains to the provider itself, rather than any interaction with AWS. service/route53 Issues and PRs that pertain to the route53 service. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet