Lakeformation table permissions need to be alphabetically ordered - otherwise aws_lakeformation_permissions stay out of sync

[chrisbulgaria]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Terraform CLI and Terraform AWS Provider Version

3.42

• aws_lakeformation_permissions

Terraform Configuration Files

resource "aws_lakeformation_permissions" "db_perm" {
  count       = var.is_ext == false ? 1 : 0
  principal   = var.read_group
  permissions = ["SELECT","DESCRIBE" ]


  table {
    database_name       = "${var.db_name}_db"
    wildcard = true
  }
}

Expected Behavior

replanning after apply doesnt show changes

Actual Behavior

module.database["grp2"].aws_lakeformation_permissions.db_perm[0] must be replaced
-/+ resource "aws_lakeformation_permissions" "db_perm" {
~ id = "466990021" -> (known after apply)
~ permissions = [ # forces replacement
- "DESCRIBE",
"SELECT",
+ "DESCRIBE",
]
~ permissions_with_grant_option = [] -> (known after apply)

Steps to Reproduce

apply above resource and plan again

[YakDriver]

@chrisbulgaria Thanks for raising this. A PR to fix this (#19817) is awaiting review.

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v3.46.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.