Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AWS MemoryDB for Redis Resources #20631

Closed
kolanos opened this issue Aug 20, 2021 · 12 comments · Fixed by #22489
Closed

AWS MemoryDB for Redis Resources #20631

kolanos opened this issue Aug 20, 2021 · 12 comments · Fixed by #22489
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope.

Comments

@kolanos
Copy link

kolanos commented Aug 20, 2021

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

AWS has recently announced MemoryDB for Redis and it is already GA. Would be great if terraform-provider-aws supported this service. Appears to have a lot of overlap with ElastiCache Redis.

I didn't see an issue for this service, so wanted to make sure one was created to track progress.

New or Affected Resource(s)

  • TBD

Potential Terraform Configuration

TBD

References

@kolanos kolanos added the enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. label Aug 20, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Aug 20, 2021
@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@anGie44 anGie44 removed the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Aug 20, 2021
@grepsedawk
Copy link

Appears to have a lot of overlap with ElastiCache Redis.

Definitely a lot of overlap here.
MemoryDB is used for persistance, Elasticache is used for ephemeral

@alexgavrisco
Copy link

@ewbankkit @anGie44 Given that MemoryDB is already available in multiple regions, do you have a guesstimate on the timeline for this feature?

@lemon-li
Copy link

lemon-li commented Nov 1, 2021

any progress ?

@grepsedawk
Copy link

Bumping this issue won't get you anywhere. If you want this dropped make a PR.

@kaelo-dev
Copy link

Does anyone know if Terraform supports MemoryDB For Redis yet?

@grepsedawk
Copy link

@kaelo-dev the issue is still open and the aren't any merged PRs, I'd say it probably isn't complete yet.
But you can always check the docs to see if it's been added.

@HugoICSilva
Copy link

Any news regarding MemoryDB for Redis in TF?
BR

@grepsedawk
Copy link

grepsedawk commented Dec 6, 2021

Bumping this issue won't get your anywhere, don't be rude.
If you want this feature, make a pull request.

@roberth-k
Copy link
Contributor

roberth-k commented Dec 14, 2021

I'll pick this up.

Looking at the API documentation, there's a lot that can be ported from ElastiCache with some modernisation. I'm planning to trickle this as separate resource PR-s as follows:

  • aws_memorydb_subnet_group. This also delivers some of the underlying utility boilerplate, such as tagging functions.
  • aws_memorydb_parameter_group
  • aws_memorydb_user, which is required for aws_memorydb_acl.
  • aws_memorydb_acl
  • With the above four in place, aws_memorydb_cluster, but excluding restore from snapshot.
  • aws_memorydb_snapshot
  • Restore from snapshot support in aws_memorydb_cluster.

I can submit PR-s for a few of the prerequisite resources in before holidays, but the aws_memorydb_cluster would have to wait until next year.

@roberth-k
Copy link
Contributor

With the exception of aws_memorydb_snapshot and sweepers, the service is available as of 3.71.0.

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

9 participants