[Docs]: Opensearch_domain_policy example has wrong syntax

[obounaim]

Documentation Link

https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws/latest/docs/resources/opensearch_domain_policy

Description

In the opensearch_domain_policy provided example :

The syntax of the aws_iam_policy_document data source is wrong, the arguments should be encapsulated in a statement argument.

Also, the values field in the condition argument should be of type list instead of string.

The example should look like this :

data "aws_iam_policy_document" "main" {
  statement {
    effect = "Allow"

    principals {
      type        = "*"
      identifiers = ["*"]
    }

    actions   = ["es:*"]
    resources = ["${aws_opensearch_domain.example.arn}/*"]

    condition {
      test     = "IpAddress"
      variable = "aws:SourceIp"
      values   = ["127.0.0.1/32"]
    }
  }
}

References

https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws/latest/docs/data-sources/iam_policy_document

Would you like to implement a fix?

None

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

Volunteering to Work on This Issue

• If you are interested in working on this issue, please leave a comment.
• If this would be your first contribution, please review the contribution guide.

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v5.23.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.