Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add eventual consistency protection on queue policy attributes #35861

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

Isaac-Bi
Copy link
Contributor

@Isaac-Bi Isaac-Bi commented Feb 16, 2024

Description

A dependency race condition occurs where the AWS API would sometimes return an ID instead of a correct ARN, resulting in an InvalidAttributeValue when trying to set the SQS Queue Policy. Adding a retry on applying the SQS Queue Policy results in fixing this eventual consistency bug.

Relations

Relates #21355
Relates #13980

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic' PKG_NAME=internal/service/sqs
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/sqs/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic
--- PASS: TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic (96.09s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/sqs	103.314s
...

Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. label Feb 16, 2024
Copy link

Hey @Isaac-Bi 👋 Thank you very much for your contribution! At times, our maintainers need to make direct edits to pull requests in order to help get it ready to be merged. Your current settings do not allow maintainers to make such edits. To help facilitate this, update your pull request to allow such edits as described in GitHub's Allowing changes to a pull request branch created from a fork documentation. (If you're using a fork owned by an organization, your organization may not allow you to change this setting. If that is the case, let us know.)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the service/sqs Issues and PRs that pertain to the sqs service. label Feb 16, 2024
@terraform-aws-provider terraform-aws-provider bot added the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Feb 16, 2024
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome @Isaac-Bi 👋

It looks like this is your first Pull Request submission to the Terraform AWS Provider! If you haven’t already done so please make sure you have checked out our CONTRIBUTOR guide and FAQ to make sure your contribution is adhering to best practice and has all the necessary elements in place for a successful approval.

Also take a look at our FAQ which details how we prioritize Pull Requests for inclusion.

Thanks again, and welcome to the community! 😃

@ewbankkit ewbankkit added eventual-consistency Pertains to eventual consistency issues. bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Feb 16, 2024
@Isaac-Bi Isaac-Bi force-pushed the b-sqs-queue-policy-retry branch from 9c2012c to 05334b2 Compare February 16, 2024 19:20
Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_' PKG=sqs ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=3
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/sqs/... -v -count 1 -parallel 3  -run=TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_Disappears_queue
=== PAUSE TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_Disappears_queue
=== RUN   TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_update
=== PAUSE TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_update
=== CONT  TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_Disappears_queue
=== CONT  TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_update
--- PASS: TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_basic (115.57s)
=== CONT  TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_Disappears_queue (119.27s)
--- PASS: TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_update (147.15s)
--- PASS: TestAccSQSQueuePolicy_disappears (141.36s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/sqs	273.352s

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@Isaac-Bi Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit merged commit dafadc1 into hashicorp:main Feb 16, 2024
33 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.38.0 milestone Feb 16, 2024
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.38.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. eventual-consistency Pertains to eventual consistency issues. service/sqs Issues and PRs that pertain to the sqs service. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants