resource/aws_security_group_rule: Additional Multi-Rule Acceptance Test Coverage

[bflad]

Details

The aws_security_group_rule rule matching logic is heavily affected by other security group rules present in the same group since there is no stable identifier for individual rules. Crashes like #6416 highlight the need for additional testing coverage. While the fix for these specific scenarios mentioned below should be covered by #6419, the testing should be in place to prevent future regressions.

For reference, this testing should look like TestAccAWSSecurityGroupRule_MultipleRuleSearching_AllProtocolCrash and cover the following scenarios with multiple rules:

• ✅ Test rule containing FromPort/ToPort while other rule is missing FromPort/ToPort (protocol ALL/-1)
• Test rule containing PrefixListIds while other rule is missing PrefixListIds
• Test rule containing IpRanges while other rule is missing IpRanges
• Test rule containing Ipv6Ranges while other rule is missing Ipv6Ranges
• Test rule containing UserIdGroupPairs while other rule is missing UserIdGroupPairs

[github-actions]

Marking this issue as stale due to inactivity. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If this issue receives no comments in the next 30 days it will automatically be closed. Maintainers can also remove the stale label.

If this issue was automatically closed and you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thank you!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!