Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Specifying Java minor version for azurerm_app_service resource #4318

Closed
constructdian opened this issue Sep 13, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4779
Closed

Support Specifying Java minor version for azurerm_app_service resource #4318

constructdian opened this issue Sep 13, 2019 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4779

Comments

@constructdian
Copy link

constructdian commented Sep 13, 2019

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

Azure Appservices support Java minor versions being specified. Specifying a minor version is also the only way to pin a Java version and prevent unwanted version auto-updates.

New or Affected Resource(s)

azurerm_app_service

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "azurerm_app_service" "myappservice" {
site_config {
java_version = "1.8.0_181"
}

References

From app_service.go

"java_version": {
	Type:     schema.TypeString,
	Optional: true,
	ValidateFunc: validation.StringInSlice([]string{
	        "1.7",
		"1.8",
		"11",
	}, false),
},
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 26, 2019

This has been released in version 1.37.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 1.37.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants