Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/openstack: Adding all_metadata attribute #13061

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2017

Conversation

jtopjian
Copy link
Contributor

This commit adds the all_metadata attribute which contains all
instance metadata returned from the OpenStack Compute API. This
is useful for gaining access to metadata which was applied
out of band of Terraform.

This commit also stops setting the original metadata attribute,
effectively making metadata an input and all_metadata the output
to reference all data from.

This commit adds the all_metadata attribute which contains all
instance metadata returned from the OpenStack Compute API. This
is useful for gaining access to metadata which was applied
out of band of Terraform.

This commit also stops setting the original metadata attribute,
effectively making metadata an input and all_metadata the output
to reference all data from.
@jtopjian jtopjian force-pushed the openstack-instance-all-metadata branch from bca38b8 to dc3ac73 Compare March 25, 2017 03:26
@@ -554,7 +558,7 @@ func resourceComputeInstanceV2Read(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) err
})
}

d.Set("metadata", server.Metadata)
d.Set("all_metadata", server.Metadata)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this just a string?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

server.Metadata is defined as map[string]string in Gophercloud.

@stack72 stack72 merged commit 7199a58 into hashicorp:master Mar 27, 2017
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 14, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 14, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants