-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
module invocations should support count #1471
Comments
I think I have a use case for this as well: Given three AWS instances, I want to create a round-robin DNS record at DNSMadeEasy. Current implementation (using ELB) is:
What I'd like to do is use I believe this is currently not possible, and I also believe that this feature request would solve my problem. |
I spoke too soon, my use case is solved using
|
I am also hitting the need for count support in modules support. The use case is for using the docker provider to launch swarm agents across a list of nodes. I have put the swarm agent setup in a module to allow for being able to dynamically set up the docker provider based on a list of nodes.
NOTE: I've reposted this here as a similar issue on this topic was closed, and figured it would be more useful to attach to an open issue. |
My use case is a module with 8 resources used for configuring infrastructure related to applications. For each application I'd like to just adjust things in a tfvars file, and not have to copy/pasta a module call. |
Hey Friends – I'm closing this as a duplicate of #953 |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
I tried to do something like nested loops of sorts by writing code that looks like:
This results in a crash:
It would be nice to be able to call a module multiple times, passing different arguments each time.
I think I can get around this with judicious use of count=${inner * outer} and modulo and division, but it feels a bit dirty.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: