Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/kubernetes: Provide more details about why PVC failed to bind #15019

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2017

Conversation

radeksimko
Copy link
Member

Before

  • kubernetes_persistent_volume_claim.test: timeout while waiting for state to become 'Bound' (last state: 'Pending', timeout: 5m0s)

After

  • kubernetes_persistent_volume_claim.test: timeout while waiting for state to become 'Bound' (last state: 'Pending', timeout: 5m0s). Reason: ProvisioningFailed: Failed to provision volume with StorageClass "standard": claim.Spec.Selector is not supported for dynamic provisioning on GCE

It would be great if we could fail fast in such cases, but there's no simple way to detect "retryable" (like not enough CPU/mem on available nodes) warnings/errors and non-retryable.

Copy link
Contributor

@grubernaut grubernaut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@radeksimko radeksimko merged commit a4c9c40 into master Jun 3, 2017
@radeksimko radeksimko deleted the f-k8s-pvc-unbound-reason branch June 3, 2017 07:21
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 11, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants