Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backend/migrations: check all workspaces #18757

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2018
Merged

Conversation

svanharmelen
Copy link
Contributor

@svanharmelen svanharmelen commented Aug 29, 2018

This commit fixes a bug that (in the case of the local backend) would only check if the selected workspace had a state when deciding to perform a migration.

When the selected workspace didn’t have a state (but other existing workspace(s) did), the migration would not be performed and the other workspaces would be ignored.

This commit fixes a bug that (in the case of the `local` backend) would only check if the selected workspace had a state when deciding to preform a migration.

When the selected workspace didn’t have a state (but other existing workspace(s) did), the migration would not be preformed and the other workspaces would be ignored.
@svanharmelen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thx!

@svanharmelen svanharmelen merged commit 4d9a284 into master Aug 29, 2018
@svanharmelen svanharmelen deleted the b-check-all-workspaces branch August 29, 2018 18:02
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 2, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants