Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

helper/schema: CoreConfigSchema refinements #19478

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2018
Merged

Conversation

apparentlymart
Copy link
Contributor

The commits in this PR are addressing some real-world situations where the schema generated by CoreConfigSchema didn't totally reflect the pre-v0.12 behavior where Terraform did not validate configuration at all.

Each of these commits is distinct from the others aside from them all being in the same package, so I expect it will be easiest to review these commit-by-commit.

This fixes both #19139 and #19422.

The SDK has a mechanism that effectively makes it possible to declare an
attribute as being _conditionally_ required, which is not a concept that
Terraform Core is aware of.

Since this mechanism is in practice only used for a small UX improvement
in prompting for these values interactively when the environment variable
is not set, we avoid here introducing all of this complexity into the
plugin protocol by just having the provider selectively modify its schema
if it detects that such an attribute might be set dynamically.

This then prevents Terraform Core from validating the presence of the
argument or prompting for a new value for it, allowing the null value to
pass through into the provider so that the default value can be generated
again dynamically.

This is a kinda-kludgey solution which we're accepting here because the
alternative would be a much-more-complex two-pass decode operation within
Core itself, and that doesn't seem worth it.

This fixes #19139.
Since the SDK's schema system conflates attributes and nested blocks, it's
possible to state some nonsensical schema situations such as:

- A nested block is both optional but has MinItems > 0
- A nested block is entirely computed but has MinItems or MaxItems set

Both of these weird situations are handled here in the same way that the
existing helper/schema validation code would've handled them: by
effectively disabling the MinItems/MaxItems checks where they would've
been ignored before.

the MinItems/MaxItems
This is no longer effective and should not be used in any new schema.
@mildwonkey
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 24, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants