Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DynamoDB Support #2121

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 17, 2015
Merged

DynamoDB Support #2121

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 17, 2015

Conversation

johnewart
Copy link
Contributor

Opening because @catsby asked that I open a PR to let folks know I'm working on this and in case anyone has some feedback. Under 🚧 - I'll be writing tests and docs as well as finishing off a few things but it is mostly functional at this point.

Remaining:

  • tests
  • docs
  • a few things

@catsby
Copy link
Contributor

catsby commented May 28, 2015

Thanks @johnewart! I updated your comment with a fancy checklist to keep everyone up to speed on our progress here. Anything I can work on?

@johnewart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm, looks like I'll need to clean up this patch after I finish docs today.

@johnewart johnewart changed the title WIP: DynamoDB (not ready for merge) DynamoDB Support Jun 4, 2015
})
}

req.AttributeDefinitions = newAttributes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no call to dynamodbconn.UpdateTable(req) with this locally scoped req, or am I missing that? The update test doesn't check any changes in the attribute map so I think this snuck through.

Alternatively, is it worth building up a single UpdateTableInput struct for a single UpdateTable call?

@catsby
Copy link
Contributor

catsby commented Jun 5, 2015

One question, other than that 👍

@johnewart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated.

@catsby
Copy link
Contributor

catsby commented Jun 17, 2015

Excellent work @johnewart, thanks!

catsby added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2015
@catsby catsby merged commit b132dd2 into hashicorp:master Jun 17, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 2, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants