Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/dnsimple: domain and type should force new records #2777

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2015

Conversation

dwradcliffe
Copy link
Contributor

DNSimple does not support changing the domain or type of a DNS record after it has been created. (https://developer.dnsimple.com/v1/domains/records/#update) Currently, at best an error occurs and at worst records are changed and your state file is corrupted. This change should fix the problem by forcing new resources for these two attributes.

I also fixed the wording to use their proper company name, DNSimple.

@dwradcliffe dwradcliffe changed the title DNSimple domain and type should force new records provider/dnsimple: domain and type should force new records Jul 18, 2015
@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Jul 29, 2015

LGTM - thanks @dwradcliffe!

phinze added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2015
provider/dnsimple: domain and type should force new records
@phinze phinze merged commit efaf639 into hashicorp:master Jul 29, 2015
@dwradcliffe dwradcliffe deleted the dnsimple_force_new branch July 29, 2015 14:34
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 1, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 1, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants