Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/aws: fix panic with SNS topic policy if omitted #3777

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 10, 2015
Merged

Conversation

catsby
Copy link
Contributor

@catsby catsby commented Nov 5, 2015

Builds of of #3751, thanks @bobtfish !

  • removes ForceNew: false
  • return "" if v is nil in StateFunc

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Nov 5, 2015

Looks good @catsby - merging this will fix my acceptance tests :)

if v == nil {
return ""
}
jsonb := []byte{}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The value of v is ignored here. What about:

s, ok := v.(string)
if !ok || s == "" {
  return ""
}
jsonb := []byte(s)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😱 great catch, thanks @rjeczalik, updated in 15533dc

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Nov 10, 2015

LGTM

catsby added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2015
provider/aws: fix panic with SNS topic policy if omitted
@catsby catsby merged commit 68764e6 into master Nov 10, 2015
@catsby catsby deleted the pr-3751 branch November 10, 2015 22:45
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 30, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 30, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants