Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDS provisioning - no option for "Storage Type" #439

Closed
wilb opened this issue Oct 17, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #896
Closed

RDS provisioning - no option for "Storage Type" #439

wilb opened this issue Oct 17, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #896

Comments

@wilb
Copy link

wilb commented Oct 17, 2014

The default storage type for RDS is now "General Purpose (SSD)" when provisioning through the web interface but there is currently no ability to select this through the aws_db_instance provisioner. Instances created through Terraform default to magnetic storage.

Whilst an option to choose between the two would be nice, maybe it would be better for terraform to default to General Purpose (SSD) to match current AWS behaviour?

@bitglue
Copy link

bitglue commented Feb 1, 2015

I've implemented a means to select the storage type, but I did not change the default behavior. Usually when an optional parameter is omitted in Terraform, Terraform omits that parameter to the API request, in this case to RDS. Although the web interface has changed its default, the RDS API still defaults to magnetic storage, unless iops is specified in which case it defaults to provisioned IOPS SSD storage.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 4, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants