Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/azurerm: add route resource #4604

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2016
Merged

Conversation

stack72
Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 commented Jan 10, 2016

Scaffold the Azure RM Route Resource

  • Schema
  • CRUD
  • Acceptance Tests
  • Documentation
make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/azurerm TESTARGS='-run=AzureRMRoute_' 2>~/tf.log

==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate ./...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run=AzureRMRoute_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMRoute_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMRoute_basic (140.85s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMRoute_multipleRoutes
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMRoute_multipleRoutes (184.58s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm    325.437s

@jen20
Copy link
Contributor

jen20 commented Jan 10, 2016

Thanks @stack72!

jen20 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2016
provider/azurerm: add route resource
@jen20 jen20 merged commit 718a1d3 into hashicorp:master Jan 10, 2016
@stack72 stack72 deleted the azurerm-route branch January 15, 2016 17:54
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants