You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We could error early if a client tries to send too many headers at once (it's unclear to me whether the RFC refers to a per-frame limitation or a total limitation). The RFC is permissive as to whether it allows senders to overpass the limit:
SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE (0x6): This advisory setting informs a
peer of the maximum size of header list that the sender is
prepared to accept, in octets. The value is based on the
uncompressed size of header fields, including the length of the
name and value in octets plus an overhead of 32 octets for each
header field.
We should at least provide a function to check whether headers are too large and let library users make their own decisions to use this information or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could error early if a client tries to send too many headers at once (it's unclear to me whether the RFC refers to a per-frame limitation or a total limitation). The RFC is permissive as to whether it allows senders to overpass the limit:
We should at least provide a function to check whether headers are too large and let library users make their own decisions to use this information or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: