Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build with integer-simple #1

Closed
basvandijk opened this issue Jan 25, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Build with integer-simple #1

basvandijk opened this issue Jan 25, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@basvandijk
Copy link

Some users of scientific require to build the package with integer-simple. After I switched to integer-logarithms I lost this capability.

Could you add integer-simple support to integer-logarithms? Let me know if you need help.

@phadej
Copy link
Collaborator

phadej commented Jan 26, 2017

Currently building ghc with integer-simple

@phadej phadej self-assigned this Jan 26, 2017
@basvandijk
Copy link
Author

basvandijk commented Jan 26, 2017

Ok. I'm doing the same :) and created a PR for nixpkgs in the process for getting a GHC with integer-simple.

@phadej
Copy link
Collaborator

phadej commented Jan 26, 2017

@basvandijk there's a PR, and tests pass locally (there's no integer-simple ghc in hvr-ppa, so cannot test on travis). But it would be great to verify with a bit larger package sets (e.g. run scientific and aeson tests?). If it's not too difficult with your nix setup, it would be great!

@phadej phadej closed this as completed in #2 Jan 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants